F* This Court and Everything It Stands for
Tamah Clark apparently wasn’t ready to accept her husband Jason Clark’s incarceration on aggravated assault and domestic battery charges, so she did what anyone would do when aggrieved by the US justice system: she loaded up her AK-47 assault rifle and .45 caliber pistol, procured some wilderness survival gear, strapped the couple’s one year old son into his car seat, and went to break her husband out of prison. Or at least that’s how the story goes.
Although phone records reportedly indicate that Tamah did indeed conspire to stage a prison break with Jason, she was apparently never convicted and would later move to sue the state of Georgia for $10 billion (which, if awarded, would have made Clark the seventh richest woman in America). Surprisingly, that suit was dismissed last month — and Tamah is not happy.
In what can only be described as perhaps the most epic court document ever filed, the Pensacola native — on behalf of herself “Jason Clark and ‘Baby’ Clark” — proceeds to explain why she believes Judge William B. Hunt erred in his ruling. The title is “To F*ck This Court And Everything It Stands For,” and although most will invariably and quite understandably focus on the innumerable profanity-laden quotables (some of which are featured below), the peculiar thing about the document is that attached to it is a 13-page manifesto entitled “Why Most Americans Do Not Inherently Owe Federal Income Taxes”which not only includes a dedication, a lengthy copyright notice, a preface, and a “legal notice to US officials”, but also reads like it was written by an 18th century statesman.
Without further ado, here are some highlights, and the full document is embedded below.
* * *
From “To F*ck This Court And Everything It Stands For”:
“That’s right-I had a cocked and fully loaded AK-47 assault rifle, as well as a .45 caliber pistol. What’s your point? And NO, I was never convicted of anything. But you know what? They can go right ahead and try to convict me ifthey want to-I don’t give a d*mn. This whole system is a joke.”
“All that the people need is a proper education, free of propaganda and lies – and I’m working on that. See Attachment A, entitled “Why Most Americans Do Not Inherently Owe Federal Income Taxes”. Let me know ifyou want to write the introduction to my next publication-there are many more to come.”
“It took me about I month to study the history of the world and to learn the history and inner workings of American jurisprudence, literally. I was born to do this here. Don’t you know that your FBI and CIA have been trying to recruit me since grade school? Lol. But they’re unscrupulous losers like you, so it won’t be happening.”
“Well, just in case you haven’t noticed-I couldn’t give two f*cks about you or what you have to say. F*ck you, old man. You’re a joke. Your court’s a joke. You suck nuts.”
“Answer me this, genius: if the original states were in existence before the federal government-with their own constitutional provisions for protecting their citizens’ unalienable human rights- then why would state citizens need to claim protection for those rights under the federal constitution? They don’t. That makes no sense. At all.”
And from “Why Most Americans Do Not Inherently Owe Federal Income Taxes”:
From the 14th Amendment (and onward), having been given a legal definition by the same, when used in the U.S. Constitution, the term “citizen of the United States” specifically refers to the second class of citizenship created thereby. But due to deception on the part ofthe U.S. Federal Government and ignorance on the part of the American People, the latter, by general consensus, now accepts the unconstitutional application of said amendment upon itself.
As a result, the general population is now regarded and treated as a federal citizenry; and state citizens, within the meaning of the original Constitution, do not presently exist. Amendments to the Federal Constitution following the 14th have been directed at citizens o f the United States. The 14th Amendment marked the beginning o f the end of the constitutional U.S. Republic and the beginning of what has, overtime, through neglect ofcivic duty, become an unconstitutional U.S. Democracy.
In revisiting the 16th Article of Amendment, it now becomes apparent that it does not inherently apply to citizens of one of the United States (e.g. constitutionally-recognized state citizens); as it neither repealed nor superseded the organic Constitution’s limitations on congressional taxation authority.
Reprinted with permission from Zero Hedge.
Leave a Reply