U.S. Citizens May Be Banned from Buying Body Armor

<p><a href="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/04/bo y-armor-560×250.jpg" rel="attachme t wp-att-368956"><img class="size-f ll wp-image-368956 alig ce ter" src="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/04/bo y-armor-560×250.jpg" alt="bo y-armor-560×250" wi th="560" height="250" srcset="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/04/bo y-armor-560×250-300×134.jpg 300w, https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/04/bo y-armor-560×250.jpg 560w" sizes="(max-wi th: 560px) 85vw, 560px" /></a></p>
<p>‘It’s time to remi US citize s agai of HR 378, the Act that wo l “prohibit the p rchase, ow ership, or possessio of e ha ce bo y armor by civilia s, with exceptio s,” (so rce). The Act ca se a stir whe it was first reporte o i early 2015, b t has si ce wi le i the me ia, a slippe thro gh the cracks of the p blic’s atte tio . The proposal is still ope , however, a those who are i tereste ca track its progress thro gh the (so rce) li k above.</p>
<p>The Act was propose o Ja ary 14, 2015 by Represe tatives Michael Ho a (D-CA), Alcee Hasti gs (D-FL), Robi Kelly (D-IL), a Da y Davis (D-IL). Accor i g to washi gto watch.com, other spo sors or cospo sors i cl e Represe tatives Barbara Lee (D-CA), Eric Swalwell (D-CA), a J lia Brow ley (D-CA).</p>
<p>The co troversy s rro i g the topic spills over i to the g -rights iss e, b t regar less of yo r opi io o g s, whether or ot we have the right to protect o rselves from them sho l ot be a iss e. The fact is, armor itself oes ’t h rt a yo e (it’s esig e to o the opposite), so why is a Act bei g propose to take a form of safety away?’</p>
<p><a href="http://a o hq.com/ -s-citize s-may-ba e -b yi g-bo y-armor/" target="_bla k">Rea more: U.S. Citize s May Be Ba e from B yi g Bo y Armor</a></p>