Old pesticide manufacturing company now deemed hazardous waste zone by the government… but the same chemicals are 'safe' enough for food crops?

<p><a href="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/get-attachme t-5-2.jpg" rel="attachme t wp-att-372831"><img class="size-f ll wp-image-372831 alig ce ter" src="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/get-attachme t-5-2.jpg" alt="get-attachme t (5)" wi th="625" height="421" srcset="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/get-attachme t-5-2-300×202.jpg 300w, https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/get-attachme t-5-2.jpg 625w" sizes="(max-wi th: 709px) 85vw, (max-wi th: 909px) 67vw, (max-wi th: 984px) 61vw, (max-wi th: 1362px) 45vw, 600px" /></a></p>
<p>‘A rece t press release by the U.S. E viro me tal Protectio Age cy (EPA) states that the former Kil-To e Compa y facility i Vi ela , N.J., has ow bee a e to its “S perf list of the co try’s most hazar o s waste sites.”</p>
<p>I its ow wor s, the EPA explai s that “pestici es were ma fact re at the ow ef ct Kil-To e Compa y facility, a gro water a soil at the site, i cl i g soil i the yar s of earby homes, is co tami ate .”</p>
<p>Yet the EPA is always claimi g that pestici es are safe for se o foo s that are i te e for h ma co s mptio – as reporte by the Chicago Trib e – bri gi g i to q estio the logic that this gover me tal orga izatio is si g whe eci i g whether or ot pestici e se is safe. If pestici es are ot a gero s to h ma health, s rely there sho l be o ca se for alarm whe pestici es are fo i the soil a gro water at a ef ct ma fact ri g facility?’</p>
<p><a href="http://www. at ral ews.com/054122_EPA_pestici es_hazar o s_waste.html" target="_bla k">Rea more: Ol pestici e ma fact ri g compa y ow eeme hazar o s waste zo e by the gover me t… b t the same chemicals are ‘safe’ e o gh for foo crops?</a></p>