WikiLeaks Cables Show a Saudi Obsession With Iran
NY Times | The documents from Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Ministry illustrate a near obsession with Iran.
News posts aggregated from alternative news sources.
NY Times | The documents from Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Ministry illustrate a near obsession with Iran.
NY Times | The documents from Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Ministry illustrate a near obsession with Iran.
Paul Joseph Watson | And replace it with ‘homosexuals’ or something politically correct.
Truth Revolt | Faces Wrath Of Megyn Kelly And Dana Loesch.
Truth Revolt | Faces Wrath Of Megyn Kelly And Dana Loesch.
al.com | Roby, R-Montgomery, called the comments “horrifying.”
al.com | Roby, R-Montgomery, called the comments “horrifying.”
WBTV | Charlotte police are asking for the public’s help after two Confederate monuments were vandalized in uptown Charlotte Wednesday.
WBTV | Charlotte police are asking for the public’s help after two Confederate monuments were vandalized in uptown Charlotte Wednesday.
Washington Times | Those who don’t return their three-year permits will have them terminated.
Washington Times | Those who don’t return their three-year permits will have them terminated.
Former Bill Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich yesterday attacked Hillary Clinton’s refusal to back reinstating Glass-Steagall—according to her economic advisor Alan Blinder—as “a big mistake”— politically, because many believe she is too close to the Wall Street banks, and “economically,” because “the repeal of Glass-Steagall led directly to the 2008 Wall Street crash.”
Reich goes through the Glass-Steagall basics: it was passed after the 1929 crash to restore the public’s faith in the banking system, by preventing banks from both taking deposits and gambling.
Reich quotes Sen. Elizabeth Warren on her Glass-Steagal bill: “The idea is pretty simple behind this one. If banks want to engage in high-risk trading — they can go for it, but they can’t get access to insured deposits and put the taxpayers on the hook for that reason.”
Noting that it worked for six decades, until its 1999 repeal, Reich adds, “A personal note. I worked for Bill Clinton as Secretary of Labor and I believe most of his economic policies were sound. But during those years I was in fairly continuous battle with some other of his advisers who seemed determined to do Wall Street’s bidding. On Glass-Steagall, they clearly won.”
Reich then debunks the canards about Glass-Steagall’s irrelevance to the 2008 crash:
• “The real culprits were non-banks like Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns.”
Reich says, “Baloney. These nonbanks get their funding from the big banks” as lines of credit, mortgages, and repurchase agreements. How could they get easy credit on bad collateral? Because Glass-Steagall was gone.”
• “Mortgage brokers” were the culprits.
Reich says they share some of the blame, but again, it was the big banks who were enablers. “The mortgage brokers couldn’t have funded the mortgage loans if the banks hadn’t bought them, and the big banks couldn’t have bought them if Glass-Steagall was still in place.”
• “None of the big banks actually failed.”
This, Reich says, is like arguing that lifeguards are no longer necessary at beaches where no one has drowned. If the government hadn’t thrown them lifelines, many would have gone under. They were bailed out because they were too big to fail.”
“This is precisely what the Glass-Steagall Act was designed to prevent—and did prevent for more than six decades. Hillary Clinton, of all people, should remember.”
And replace it with ‘homosexuals’ or something politically correct.
Paul Joseph Watson | And replace it with ‘homosexuals’ or something politically correct.
In a long interview with the New Statesman published July 13, former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis described how the Eurogroup and the ECB from the beginning plotted to put Greece up against a wall and force it into a humiliating defeat.
In the Eurogroup, comprising the euro area finance ministers, Varoufakis was simply ignored by his fellow finance ministers; his interventions and proposals at meetings were not responded to. The Eurogroup used dilatory tactics and then accused Greece of implementing those tricks. Germany’s Schäuble once blurted out that he would not discuss the program, because it has been accepted by the previous government and “we can’t possibly allow an election to change anything. Because we have elections all the time, there are 19 of us; if every time there was an election and something changed, the contracts between us wouldn’t mean anything.”
At that point, Varoufakis stood up and said: “Well, perhaps we should simply not hold elections any more for indebted countries,” and there was no answer.
In Varoufakis’s reconstruction, the decisive role of the ECB in strangling Greece is briefly but clearly described:
“We should issue our own IOUs, or even at least announce that we’re going to issue our own euro-denominated liquidity; we should haircut the Greek 2012 bonds that the ECB held, or announce we were going to do it; and we should take control of the Bank of Greece. This was the triptych, the three things, which I thought we should respond with if the ECB shut down our banks.
“… I was warning the Cabinet this was going to happen [the ECB closing our banks] for a month, in order to drag us into a humiliating agreement. When it happened — and many of my colleagues couldn’t believe it happened — my recommendation for responding ‘energetically,’ let’s say, was voted down.”