Egyptians are furious at the allegations expressed by British Prime Minister David Cameron (in the face of President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi who is visiting Britain), that terrorists downed the Russian civilian airplane in the Sinai. This hits at many sensitive issues: (1) ISIS is almighty, and Egypt cannot secure the country. (2) A major hit at Egypt’s economy, which is still reliant on tourism. (3) Affects Egyptian-Russian relations. (4) Gives a boost to the terrorists Russia is fighting in Syria and the terrorists Egypt is fighting at home.

The strongest statement came from the Chairman of the Board of Al-Ahram publishing corporation and think tank, Said Ahmad El-Naggar. He is an outspoken anti-Wahhabi, is pro-Syrian unity and sovereignty, supports Russia’s intervention in Syria, and is a promoter of the extension of the Silk Road to Egypt, the Middle East, and Africa. He has recently created such a crisis with Saudi Arabia—by accusing it of supporting takfiri terrorism— that the Saudi Ambassador was called home. He had a near fist fight with the Saudi Ambassador in Algeria, who threw a glass of water in his opponent’s face during a political debate.

El-Naggar wrote the following on his Facebook page today (EIR translation):

“What Britain is doing can be considered the cheapest and lowest form of political rudeness, which it has saved to utter to coincide with the visit of the President of Egypt. Egyptians have tried to forget the history of Britain’s thievery and murder when it occupied Egypt and looted, killed, and tortured the Egyptian people for 72 years.

“Egyptians have tried to forget in order to build ties based on mutual benefit. But Britain insists on reminding us that it is an enemy of Egypt through launching a severe insult against Egypt and the tourism sector, and against the millions of workers and services related to it.

“It did not even bother to present a single piece of evidence for its allegations; that sounds like a sabotage operation rather than an effort to find the truth, which experts from Egypt, Russia, and France are working hard to discover.

“The only case which could lead Britain to make such a statement with confidence—that there was a terrorist act behind the tragedy of the Russian plane crash in Sinai, without showing evidence backing the claim—is that Britain had prior knowledge of, and collaboration with the terrorists, since Britain is the safe haven for all kinds of terrorist groups. Britain does not deserve the continuation of the Presidential State visit.” 

On the eve of the COP21 conference in Paris at the end of this month, the LaRouche Citizens’ Movement of Mexico, MOCILA, intervened on Nov. 4 in a Senate “Forum of Analysis” of Pope Francis’s Laudato Si’ encyclical, to expose its true genocidal character and the role of such satanists as Hans Joachim Schellnhuber.

The forum was organized by the Senate Select Climate Change Committee, led by Sen. Silvia Garza Galvan of the National Action Party (PAN). Co-sponsors included the Mexican Institute for Christian Social Doctrine (IMDOSOC) and the Konrad Adenauer Foundation. This was a historic event, in the sense that, despite the fact that Mexico is a Catholic country, for the first time, the Senate opened its doors to high-level representatives of the Church. Monsignor Rogelio Cabrera Lopez, Archbishop of Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, and Monsignor Juan Armando Perez Talamantes, the Auxiliary Bishop of Monterrey, attended to officially present the Pope’s encyclical. The Pope is scheduled to visit Mexico in February 2016.

Before a large audience of senators, priests, leaders of social groups, environmentalists, academics, students and media, MOCILA member Carolina Domínguez was given time to speak from the floor, representing those who oppose the encyclical’s anti-human message.

The legitimate question that should be asked, she said, is whether it’s true that anthropogenic activity, human activity in the biosphere, is the cause of climate change. “We should also be asking,” she said, “who is advising Pope Francis? His name is Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, a Malthusian very close to the Club of Rome.” She went on to charge that the Club of Rome’s networks, and their premise that there are limits to growth, have taken control of the Holy See, and from there of many other institutions to create a “scientific consensus” and launch the offensive against human industrial activity, supposedly because it is responsible for climate change.

Domínguez appealed to the the Church leaders present, and to the audience, to “reestablish the concept of Imago Viva Dei — that is, man in the living image of God, in which the goodness that man receives from the Creator, and his protection of the common good, is recognized.” And yet, the MOCILA leader charged, that concept is not reflected in the Pope’s encyclical. Rather, it states that man is evil, and that the carbon dioxide that humanity emits is the cause of climate change—this, when it has been proven that the quantity of carbon dioxide in greenhouse gases is insignificant. In a direct challenge, Domínguez asked the bishops, how it was possible that the Catholic Church in Mexico is supporting a doctrine which it has historically and consistently always rejected.

Following the event, MOCILA members were able to speak with senators and Church leaders about how the plan to reduce CO2, decarbonizing the economy, is a plan to exterminate a large portion of the human population.

Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), initiator of the House bill to re-instate Glass-Steagall (H.R. 381, “Return to Prudent Banking Act of 2015”), yesterday spoke on the House floor, calling on Congress to take action. The latest signer is Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-PA), Philadelphia, who co-signed on Nov. 3.

Kaptur’s remarks follow, from the full transcript in the Congressional Record for Nov. 5: