The Obama Administration waited until the final hours of the Congressional session before a six week recess to release the slightly redacted 28 page chapter from the original 2002 Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9/11.  Despite the timing, the release was a tremendous victory, that now puts the entire Anglo-Saudi Empire in the cross-hairs for their now-documented role in the worst terrorist atrocity on US soil. Furthermore, a careful reading of the partially redacted 28 pages makes clear that Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) was absolutely correct when he said last year that the 28 pages force a total rethinking of everything that has happened over the past 15 years.

The level of evidence of Saudi Monarchy involvement in the 9/11 attacks is far beyond what was previously publicly known. Scores of Saudi officials and members of the Royal family were intimately involved with al-Qaeda, and many had close links to the hijackers directly.  U.S. agencies had evidence of deep Saudi sponsorship of al-Qaeda years before the 9/11 attacks, but any serious crackdown was suppressed and investigators were fired or transferred for asking too many of the right questions.

What is now urgently needed is a new top-down investigation, that starts with the Anglo-Saudi hand behind 9/11, but which extends far beyond those events of 15 years ago, to look into all of the subsequent terrorist atrocities and events like the Iraq and Libyan invasions, the ongoing regime-change efforts against the Assad regime in Syria and much more.

Lyndon LaRouche emphasized today that the momentum must be maintained for a new investigation that explores the depths of the Anglo-Saudi complex.  Nothing short of that will root out the terror disease.

The release of the 28 pages, coming just days after the release of the Chilicot Commission Report in Britain is a deadly one-two punch to the heart of the British Empire and its Saudi partners.  On the release of the 28 pages, Rep. Walter Jones, who led the Congressional fight, extended his thanks and congratulations to the LaRouche Movement for our pivotal role in forcing the release.  He vowed to now move to the next level of investigation and not stop until the full truth is out for all to see.

In February 1990, Col. Fletcher Prouty (USAF-ret.), a legendary figure within the U.S. intelligence community, who was the first whistleblower on the corrupting of the American intelligence establishment with his Secret Team expose book, wrote a chilling essay on the recent assassination of Deutsche Bank Chairman Alfred Herrhausen.  Prouty directly equated the Herrhausen assassination with the assassination in 1963 of President John F. Kennedy, and he made clear that he did not buy the idea that Herrhausen was killed by “terrorists,” arguing instead that the assassins were pawns of a major state intelligence service.

Prouty wrote: “It is absolutely astounding that the subject of the savage murder of this man… Alfred Herrhausen… has been dropped so suddenly from the news.  The Deutsche Bank of Germany is undoubtedly one of the most important banks in the world. and its Chairman Herrhausen was one of the most important spokesmen of the banking profession around the world.  He would have been a key man in all developments.

“His loss at this time… and the startling nature of his loss are without question… for our day… the equal of the loss of President John F. Kennedy in 1963.

“Considering the time… the enormous train of events taking place in the Soviet Union, in Eastern Europe and particularly in East Germany… the murder of Herrhausen is an act of enormous significance.  It can not be, and must not be swept under the rug as just ‘another act of terrorism.’  True terrorists do not murder bank presidents without some special reason.  Most terrorists are actually the paid pawns, and `mechanics’ of great power centers.  Some major power center wanted the Chairman of Deutsche Bank removed on that day, in that manner for some reason, and as a lesson to others.  There has to be a great message in the act of his death.”

Prouty’s seven-page essay went on to quote from the speech that JFK was slated to deliver in Dallas, Texas on Nov. 22, 1963, and the speech that Herrhausen was slated to deliver in New York City on Dec. 4, 1989—four days after his assassination.

Friday morning, Deutsche Bank’s Chief Economist David Folkerts-Landau, in an interview on CNBC TV, again made his call for a bail-out/recapitalization for European banks, saying that the central bank policy is a failure, and is destroying the channel for credit into the SME sector (small and medium-sized enterprises). LaRouche, briefed on this, noted that the topic is very rational, but of the elements involved, some are known, and some are in doubt. He made a point of the significance of Alfred Herrhausen, chairman of Deutsche Bank from 1971, until November, 1989, when he was assassinated.

LaRouche said that capitalization, as such, is not an effective instrument for the situation. The values in question should be cancelled out. There is no way to get out of the mess by doing otherwise. It is like, trying to get a sick person into being a sicker person, and calling him a “sicker achiever!”

The approach itself is the problem. Deduction is always the problem. You have a swindle, a fake of a system. So, you have to go back to “go” and start again. You can’t try to “fix it.” It is not a “fix it” problem.

Consider: What is the system of economy. You have to follow what Herrhausen was establishing. He was assassinated to cancel this effort, to create the wreckage that followed. That was the purpose of the assassination. Any idea of “negotiating” some change, is a fraud.

There must be cancellation of so-called wealth, which is not fit to be called wealth. Then look at what remains. Figure out what to do. There must be a self-developing program of productivity. NOT a bargaining’ process. Go with something else. You can’t go with negotiations. You have to generate productive power, and generate increasing productivity, on a permanent basis.

The productivity ratio is the primary creation. You can’t “adduce” something by adducing it. Build something new, as a start. Cancel all forms of negotiation. You have to accept that program—of Herrhausen. Accept “his,” not “something like his.” The motive of killing him, ostensibly—by the French and British networks—was to stop this system. We must proceed by not talking of “negotiations by adjustments.” We must eliminate the present concept of finance, not “improve” the system of finance. We don’t want a “softer system.” Forget money, and think of economy, what it does for economy.

What was done by the British/French system to assassinate Herrhausen, was to prevent escape from the fraud. You can’t “fix-up” what was a fraud from the beginning. Today, we must come up with a good instrument. End what was wrong then, and today.

It’s simple: 1) Herrhausen was killed; and 2) the British and other systems were involved. They did it to shut down anything connected to him. The perpetrators intended to prevent Herrhausen, or anything like him, to ever take control. Look who is still around—George Soros, a leading problem, and British.