Gen. Peter B. Zwack, who served as U.S. military attaché in Moscow during part of the Obama presidency, has published a strong call for an immediate resumption of U.S.-Russia bilateral military dialogue, to both advance the war against the Islamic State and re-establish institutional contacts to avoid war.  Gen. Zwack wrote in Defense One that he was present in Jan. 2014 at the very last high-level discussion between American and Russian military commanders. 

“It’s way past time for senior U.S. and Russian defense leaders and staffs to start meeting again,” he wrote, adding “it is increasingly dangerous in this cyber-fast world for both our nuclear-tipped nations to have such a dearth of contact.”

  He urged that such lines of regular communication would be

“hardnosed practical business: adding some human familiarity at key command-and-control nodes that might keep a sudden accident or incident from flashing into catastrophe. In a fast-breaking crisis, you want leaders who already know one another.  And over time, these linkages might help us move beyond these sour political times, and rebuild the kind of relationships that will allow our countries to work on global challenges where we have areas of common interest.”

Gen. Zwack called for Obama to give the green light for Defense Secretary Ashton Carter and JCS Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford to meet with their Russian counterparts, Sergey Shoigu and Gen. Valery Gerasimov.

Gen. Zwack cited the Paris attacks, the Sinai bombing, and other recent events as obvious reasons for re-establishing the military-to-military institutional dialogue, warning

“without a dialogue of any consequence our strategic defense relationship will be even more dangerous and prone to hair-trigger miscalculation or misunderstanding … Without contact, we both continue to demonize each other while hardening our populations. It’s better agreeing to disagree than having no discussion at all.  Without direct dialogue between our senior defense leaders we cannot even begin to consider a more mutually cooperative and secure future.” 

In an interview with Democracy Now! on Friday night, Nov. 20, former drone operator Michael Haas, one of the signers of the powerful letter opposing the drone killings, detailed the hideous policy and behavior toward killing civilians by remote control.  Haas told interviewer Amy Goodman, “the term ‘fun-sized terrorists’ was used to just sort of denote children that we’d see on screen.”  Haas then elaborated, “Other terms we’d use would be ‘cutting the grass before it grows too long,’ just doing whatever you can to try to make it easier to kill whatever’s on screen.  And the culture is, that mentality is very much nurtured within the drone community, because these,— every Hellfire shot is sort of lauded and applauded, and we don’t really examine who exactly was killed, but just that it was an effective shot and the missile hit its target.”

Haas is one of the drone operator whistleblowers who appears in the documentary, “Drone,” which opened at the AMC theater in Manhattan on Nov. 20 and will be playing this week in New York City and Toronto, Canada.

The movie team is running a high profile campaign to build support for stopping the drone murders.  On Friday night, Jeremy Scahill, one of the founders of The Intercept that published the “Drone Papers” secret documents, appeared with the film’s director, Tonje Hessen Schei, and former drone operator Brandon Bryant following the 7 PM screening.  On Saturday afternoon and evening, Bryant appeared again, first with the attorney for the whistleblowers, Jesselyn Radack, and then with the film’s producers for a question and answer session.

On the film’s website, dronethedocumentary.com, an advertisement quotes Lawrence Wilkerson, Colonel U.S. Army (retired): “Our potential collective future. Watch it and weep for us. Or watch it and determine to change that future.” Wilkerson is the former aide to Colin Powell in the Bush/Cheney administration, who is an outspoken and frequent opponent of the perpetual war policy of both Bush and Obama, and who gave a lengthy interview to EIR in 2011.

Two other films exposing the drone program are also circulating. A 2013 documentary called, “Unmanned: The Drone Wars,” features interviews with victims of the drone attacks, including the brother of the innocent 16-year old Pakistani boy, Tariq Aziz. “Good Kill” (2014), a Hollywood movie starring Ethan Hawke, is a fictionalized account of the psychological breakdown of a drone operator who questions his role. 

Why did it take 15 months for the U.S. to target the Islamic State’s oil infrastructure?

Paul Joseph Watson | Why did it take 15 months for the U.S. to target the Islamic State’s oil infrastructure?

UK Express | INTELLIGENCE chiefs fear that British jihadis helped make the suicide vests worn by the Paris attackers and could be plotting a similar outrage in the UK.

Gateway Pundit | On Saturday an unhinged left-wing activists stormed Donald Trump’s massive rally in Alabama.

Bizpac Review | “How many more protests are you going to do?”

Bizpac Review | An angry Judge Judy tore into three miscreants who vandalized a man’s confederate flag.

Washington Times | Monthly highs for October, November to date suggest White House victory lap premature.

Bloomberg | U.S. actions in the Middle East helped Islamic State to gain influence, Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said, according to Interfax.

RT | Russian airstrikes have torched more than 1,000 tankers taking stolen crude oil to Islamic State refineries.

Reuters | The oversupply in the oil market is absolutely killing prices and it’s only set to get worse in 2016.

Zero Hedge | Note that no tin foil hats or conspiracy theories are needed.