Campaign for Liberty has joined a collation of anti-surveillance state groups from across the political spectrum in support of the End Warrantless Surveillance Act (HR 2233), legislation introduced by Republican Representative Ted Poe (TX-02), Representative Thomas Massie (KY-04) and Democratic Representatives Zoe Lofgren (CA-19).

This legislation is based on the amendment Representatives Poe and Lofgren tried to attach to the USA FREEDOM Act, and takes a major step toward restoring our Fourth amendment rights.

Campaign for Liberty is continuing our efforts to roll-back the Surveillance State. Please support our efforts by signing your I OBJECT Citizen’s Petition to Senate Leader Mitch McConnell and please contribute to our Stop the Surveillance State Round Two Money Bomb.

Text of the letter available here an below:

Dear Representatives Massie, Lofgren, and Poe:

We write in strong support of your legislation to close backdoors that allow the National Security Agency to conduct surveillance of electronic communications. The legislation is similar to another measure you introduced, House Amendment 935 to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for FY 2015, which received overwhelming support. It additionally addresses warrantless searches conducted under an Executive order. The ongoing revelations about the intrusive nature and broad scope of government surveillance have badly damaged the trust users have in the security of their Internet communications. This legislation would help begin to restore that trust in three ways.

First, the bill would address the “backdoor search loophole,” which refers to the government’s practice of searching for information about U.S. persons in databases of communications collected under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (50 U.S.C. § 1881a). This bill would address that loophole by prohibiting searches of those databases for communications of a U.S. person absent a court order or special circumstances. Those circumstances include when consent is given, the person is the subject of the (aforementioned) order or emergency authorization that authorizes electronic or physical search, or the entity carrying out the search has reasonable belief that the life or safety of the person is threatened and the information is sought for the purpose of assisting the person. Although Section 702 prohibits the government from intentionally targeting the communications of U.S. persons, the government asserts the authority to query those communications in other circumstances under Section 702. In response, the legislation prohibits the intentional targeting of a person outside the United States if “a purpose” is to target a particular, known person reasonably believed to be in the U.S.

Second, the bill generally prohibits the searching of communications of a known U.S. person collected without a court order under an Executive order. As with searches under Section 702, exceptions include when consent is given, the person is the subject of an order or emergency authorization that authorizes electronic or physical search, or the entity carrying out the search has reasonable belief that the life or safety of the person is threatened and the information is sought for the purpose of assisting the person. This will help ensure surveillance undertaken pursuant to an Executive order does not become a subterfuge to avoid the court order requirement that would apply if a U.S. person were targeted directly.

Finally, the bill would prohibit the government from requiring or requesting that any person or entity build back doors into its products or services that would facilitate electronic surveillance of users of such products or services. This is a sensible limitation that not only improves transparency of surveillance practices, but also promotes security by avoiding the creation of potential vulnerabilities that can later be exploited by criminals and other bad actors. Notably, this particular provision would exempt any mandates or requests that are made with regard to products and services that are covered under the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA).

All three of these measures would make appreciable changes that would advance government surveillance reform and help rebuild lost trust among Internet users and businesses, while also preserving national security and intelligence authorities. We urge the Congress to move speedily to enact this legislation.

Sincerely,

Advocacy for Principled Action in Government, American Association of Law Libraries, American Civil Liberties Union, Arab American Institute, Bill of Rights Defense Committee, Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, Campaign for Liberty, Center for Democracy and Technology, Competitive Enterprise Institute, CREDO, Data Foundry, Defending Dissent Foundation, Demand Progress, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Fight for the Future, Free Press Action Fund, FreedomWorks, Golden Frog, Government Accountability Project, National Security Counselors, New America’s Open Technology Institute, OpenTheGovernment.org, Restore The Fourth, RootsAction.org, Sunlight Foundation, TechFreedom, The Constitution Project, X-Lab

Campaign for Liberty has joined a collation of anti-surveillance state groups from across the political spectrum in support of the End Warrantless Surveillance Act (HR 2233), legislation introduced by Republican Representative Ted Poe (TX-02), Representative Thomas Massie (KY-04) and Democratic Representatives Zoe Lofgren (CA-19).

This legislation is based on the amendment Representatives Poe and Lofgren tried to attach to the USA FREEDOM Act, and takes a major step toward restoring our Fourth amendment rights.

Campaign for Liberty is continuing our efforts to roll-back the Surveillance State. Please support our efforts by signing your I OBJECT Citizen’s Petition to Senate Leader Mitch McConnell and please contribute to our Stop the Surveillance State Round Two Money Bomb.

Text of the letter available here an below:

Dear Representatives Massie, Lofgren, and Poe:

We write in strong support of your legislation to close backdoors that allow the National Security Agency to conduct surveillance of electronic communications. The legislation is similar to another measure you introduced, House Amendment 935 to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for FY 2015, which received overwhelming support. It additionally addresses warrantless searches conducted under an Executive order. The ongoing revelations about the intrusive nature and broad scope of government surveillance have badly damaged the trust users have in the security of their Internet communications. This legislation would help begin to restore that trust in three ways.

First, the bill would address the “backdoor search loophole,” which refers to the government’s practice of searching for information about U.S. persons in databases of communications collected under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (50 U.S.C. § 1881a). This bill would address that loophole by prohibiting searches of those databases for communications of a U.S. person absent a court order or special circumstances. Those circumstances include when consent is given, the person is the subject of the (aforementioned) order or emergency authorization that authorizes electronic or physical search, or the entity carrying out the search has reasonable belief that the life or safety of the person is threatened and the information is sought for the purpose of assisting the person. Although Section 702 prohibits the government from intentionally targeting the communications of U.S. persons, the government asserts the authority to query those communications in other circumstances under Section 702. In response, the legislation prohibits the intentional targeting of a person outside the United States if “a purpose” is to target a particular, known person reasonably believed to be in the U.S.

Second, the bill generally prohibits the searching of communications of a known U.S. person collected without a court order under an Executive order. As with searches under Section 702, exceptions include when consent is given, the person is the subject of an order or emergency authorization that authorizes electronic or physical search, or the entity carrying out the search has reasonable belief that the life or safety of the person is threatened and the information is sought for the purpose of assisting the person. This will help ensure surveillance undertaken pursuant to an Executive order does not become a subterfuge to avoid the court order requirement that would apply if a U.S. person were targeted directly.

Finally, the bill would prohibit the government from requiring or requesting that any person or entity build back doors into its products or services that would facilitate electronic surveillance of users of such products or services. This is a sensible limitation that not only improves transparency of surveillance practices, but also promotes security by avoiding the creation of potential vulnerabilities that can later be exploited by criminals and other bad actors. Notably, this particular provision would exempt any mandates or requests that are made with regard to products and services that are covered under the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA).

All three of these measures would make appreciable changes that would advance government surveillance reform and help rebuild lost trust among Internet users and businesses, while also preserving national security and intelligence authorities. We urge the Congress to move speedily to enact this legislation.

Sincerely,

Advocacy for Principled Action in Government, American Association of Law Libraries, American Civil Liberties Union, Arab American Institute, Bill of Rights Defense Committee, Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, Campaign for Liberty, Center for Democracy and Technology, Competitive Enterprise Institute, CREDO, Data Foundry, Defending Dissent Foundation, Demand Progress, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Fight for the Future, Free Press Action Fund, FreedomWorks, Golden Frog, Government Accountability Project, National Security Counselors, New America’s Open Technology Institute, OpenTheGovernment.org, Restore The Fourth, RootsAction.org, Sunlight Foundation, TechFreedom, The Constitution Project, X-Lab