A British Trick? This Is Not The Bernie Sanders He’s Represented Himself To Be

On Sunday Oct. 11, just as Barack Obama was being shown up again, on “60 Minutes,” for the aggressive, blustering, but weak “British war President” he’s turned out to be, he received lavish praise from Bernie Sanders on “Face the Nation.”

This is, presumably, the Bernie Sanders who wanted a candidate to challenge the “deeply disappointing” Obama, running for re-election, three years ago. The Bernie Sanders who said then, on the Thom Hartman television show:

So, candidate Sanders has done a recent flip, one which will hurt him in electoral terms, just as Hillary Clinton has been hurt by appearing to be a mouthpiece for Obama. It can be noted that Bernie Sanders’ on-line fundraising is being run by the same leading people who ran the same for Obama in 2007-08, two of whom have been working for the White House since; and this Obama fundraising operation has boosted Sanders’ fundraising up to Hillary Clinton’s level. But the more important matter is whether Bernie Sanders has become part of a bigger British trick corrupting the Democratic primary, effectively letting Obama pick its winner, and suppressing the recently dominant dynamic of candidates backing restoration of Glass-Steagall, and pushing other candidates in that direction.

Obama has been an agent of Wall Street/City of London interests, and British wars, throughout his Presidency. Wall Street and London, facing a new financial collapse, want, above all, to crush the Glass-Steagall dynamic out of the election campaign.

The same kind of British tricks were run in Obama’s first campaign for President, and in other campaigns in American history, making them fraudulent.

Is Bernie Sanders reliable? Why did he omit mention on Oct. 11 of his hitherto support of restoring Glass- Steagall? Where is his mind now; where will it be tomorrow?