O’Bomber Looks to Blow Up Private Gun Ownership and Finish His Dictatorship With a Bang

Well, here we go again. With the backing of 123 Democrats, the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2015” was offered to the House of Criminals, or Congress they call it, this past Wednesday, December 16^th. That’s almost a third of the House that believes along with sponsor Rhode Island Demoncrat David N. Cicilline, that the Second Amendment is not unlimited and that the federal government has the right to remove weapons used in mass murderer.

Cicilline said the following in a statement accompanying the bill:

“Since 2011, the frequency of mass shootings has increased by a factor of three. And according to one study, more than half of all mass shooters used an assault weapon, a gun with a military-style feature, or a high-capacity magazine. The sole purpose of these types of weapons is to kill as many people as quickly as possible. It is unconscionable that we continue to allow military-style weapons to be bought and sold while mass shootings are growing more common. This bill is an important first step that will restore some sanity to the way we treat guns in the United States,”

Cicilline’s bill, H.R.4269, is fairly restrictive and when added up in entirety, the types of guns they want to steal would be almost 800.

According to an article at Guns.com, the legislation “would ban semi-auto handguns and rifles with a detachable magazine and only one ‘military-style feature’ such as a pistol grip, telescoping or folding stock, or bayonet mount … Likewise, detachable magazines capable of holding 10 or more rounds would be prohibited. Further, the bill in its current form would prohibit semi-auto rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine capable of holding more than 10 rounds as well as semi-auto shotguns of any kind if they had a banned cosmetic feature.”

Other commentary surrounding the bill compare it to Australian legislation that is very confiscatory as well. The Democratic bill would basically restrict shooters to single-bolt weapons. In other words, people could own guns that could fire one shot at a time.

Why is this important? The conspiracy-minded will argue that single-shot weapons are almost useless against weapons that can be fired at will in sustained bursts. In other words, government types are trying to ensure that the citizenry has no chance against US military might.

With a Republican majority in the House that is still wedded to stopping gun control, there is little chance the bill will pass, according to inside observers, but that is not stopping the extraordinary push the administration is making to remove guns from the population.

According to the Common Sense Show and based on information leaked from a Department of Justice “white paper,” Obama “will ultimately implement the following gun control regulations, mostly through a series of Executive Orders.”

Executive Orders are used to institute tyranny and subvert the already criminal and immoral democratic process.

Regulations to be implemented – presumably next year – via dictatorial decree include taxes on ammunition, prosecution of gun manufacturers and bullet producers. The administration will also buy ammunition to create shortages and make ammunition more expensive as well as stockpiling it in the hands of the most dangerous people in society, the government. Buying a gun and transporting it across state lines will become more onerous. Civil authorities will be given the option of entering homes of registered gun owners without warrants to ensure proper gun storage and safety and fines and even incarceration may be in order for those deemed non compliant. Additionally, there is talk about placing ceilings on gun purchases within given geographical regions.

Another goal is to make gun ownership similiar to the licensing procedure they do now regarding automotive license (permission from the government to allow its tax slaves to drive). Further mass shooting incidents, which are often done by the government themselves, may result in the Obama administration making an effort to overturn conceal and carry laws that are now present in numerous states.

There’s more. In cases of suspected child abuse (such as allowing your children to play outside in the yard without supervision), gun owners will come under increased suspicion. People who have committed past crimes, murders and torture, such as veterans, will come under additional scrutiny as well and supposedly there are discussions at the DOJ about mandating counseling and rationing for all returning mercenaries… or what they call veterans. The IRS may be given increased powers as well to seize bank and accounts and even homes of those found to be non-compliant.

All it needs, we are informed, are a few more mass-shootings. These shootings appear to be in large part false flag events of the sort that brought the National Socialists to power in Germany. Significant questions have been raised in the uncontrolled (aka alternative) media about the official narratives regarding events such as the Boston Marathon fake bombing and Sandy Hoax.

Those apt to view government narratives with a high degree of skepticism, ought to examine a spate of recent reports (perhaps due to increased Russian-US tensions) referring to a book first published in 1987 that present evidence the Pentagram, or Pentagon, was actively engaged in planning for a nuclear “first strike” against the USSR from 1945-1949, a time when the USSR did not possess nuclear weapons.

The book by Dr. Michio Kaku and Daniel Axelrod is based on declassified top secret documents and entitled “To Win a Nuclear War: the Pentagon’s Secret War Plans.” Reportedly, both the Pentagon and Britain under the baleful influence of Winston Churchill drew up detailed plans to drop dozens if not hundreds of nuclear devices on Russia and its satellite states to reduce the state apparatus to rubble.

Any government that can plot the deaths of literally hundreds of millions via an unprovoked attack is certainly composed of individuals who will contemplate numerous other steps to consolidate power and render the authoritarianism they support impervious to additional challenges.

Are such people still in charge in the US and Britain? Ánd if so, would they be reluctant to manufacture mini-massacres to create a groundswell of support for gun confiscations? And further, would such individuals then shrink from using the awesome power of an advanced military machine to reduce or eliminate by force those whom they believed might prove inimical to a new and more authoritarian regime?

In light of such revelations, even ignoring substantively suspicious elements surrounding recent mass-shootings, one ought to be taking steps to secure self-defense capabilities.

The Dollar Vigilante is focused on the coming economic storm but it is certainly possible that an economic disaster will lead to significant domestic disturbances that will justify the confiscation of guns or even declarations of martial law. A large “terrorist attack” – real or manufactured – would accomplish the same goals.

No doubt 2016 is a time when all of us ought to practice heightened local and federal vigilance. As the Department of Homeland Insecurity, Janet Napolitano said, “If you see something, say something”… it’s just the government you should be watching vigilantly, not your neighbors!

To make sure we can provide you with every opportunity to secure the wealth and safety of your family, please subscribe to our newsletter, which also provides you with access to our white papers and books.

Thousands have already subscribed and if you are reading this article, we hope to number you among them. Every subscription is a ballot supporting our efforts and provides us further resources to serve you better in these increasingly critical times.

Originally Appeared At The Dollar Vigilante