Should Paxil be banned? The only 'evidence' of effectiveness was ghostwritten by Glaxo Smith Kline's public relations firm

<p><a href="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/03/get-attachme t-324-5.jpg" rel="attachme t wp-att-367071"><img class="size-f ll wp-image-367071 alig ce ter" src="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/03/get-attachme t-324-5.jpg" alt="get-attachme t (324)" wi th="1200" height="900" srcset="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/03/get-attachme t-324-5-300×225.jpg 300w, https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/03/get-attachme t-324-5-768×576.jpg 768w, https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/03/get-attachme t-324-5-1024×768.jpg 1024w, https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/03/get-attachme t-324-5.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-wi th: 709px) 85vw, (max-wi th: 909px) 67vw, (max-wi th: 1362px) 62vw, 840px" /></a></p>
<p>‘I 2001, a st y was p blishe i the Jo r al of the America Aca emy of Chil a A olesce t Psychiatry, showi g that the SSRI a ti epressa t paroxeti e – sol er the ames Paxil, Aropax a Seroxat – was safe, well tolerate a effective for the treatme t of epressio , obsessive-comp lsive isor er, post-tra matic stress isor er a social a xiety i a lts a tee agers.</p>
<p>However, a rece t rea alysis of the same ata, p blishe i the British Me ical Jo r al (BMJ), reports that the opposite is tr e. It is the first rea alysis of a r g trial by a collaboratio of researchers calle RIAT (Restori g I visible a Aba o e Trials). Their aim is to correct aba o e or misreporte st ies to e s re that octors a patie ts are give the most acc rate i formatio .’</p>
<p><a href="http://www. at ral ews.com/053466_Paxil_fra le t_scie ce_a ti epressa t_ r gs.html" target="_bla k">Rea more: Sho l Paxil be ba e ? The o ly ‘evi e ce’ of effective ess was ghostwritte by Glaxo Smith Kli e’s p blic relatio s firm</a></p>

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.