History of Nordic EU referendums holds lessons for British vote

<p><a href="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/04/U title -317-1.jpg" rel="attachme t wp-att-369965"><img class="size-f ll wp-image-369965 alig ce ter" src="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/04/U title -317-1.jpg" alt="U title (317)" wi th="800" height="450" srcset="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/04/U title -317-1-300×169.jpg 300w, https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/04/U title -317-1-768×432.jpg 768w, https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/04/U title -317-1.jpg 800w" sizes="(max-wi th: 709px) 85vw, (max-wi th: 909px) 67vw, (max-wi th: 984px) 61vw, (max-wi th: 1362px) 45vw, 600px" /></a></p>
<p>‘With Britai ’s oisy campaig over a possible Brexit polarizi g voters, tight refere ms over EU membership two eca es ago i Norway a Swe e offer lesso s how campaig s that stay positive a foc s o or i ary people ca swi g voters at the last mi te.</p>
<p>I the space of j st two weeks i 1994, Swe e vote by 52.3 perce t to joi the EU, while Norway vote by 52.2 perce t to stay o t. They were two of the closest-r EU refere ms i history, mome to s ecisio s that split families, ge eratio s a political parties.</p>
<p>Both atio s are releva t to the British campaig . Norway is to te as a mo el by Brexit s pporters, with close EU tra e ties espite remai i g o tsi e. Swe e is see as a s ccessf l arm’s-le gth approach to EU membership, retai i g its ow c rre cy.’</p>
<p><a href="http://www.japa times.co.jp/ ews/2016/04/24/worl /politics- iplomacy-worl /history-of- or ic-e -refere ms-hol s-lesso s-for-british-vote/#.Vx3QHvkrKM9" target="_bla k">Rea more: History of Nor ic EU refere ms hol s lesso s for British vote</a></p>
<h3 style="text-alig : ce ter;">Davi Icke – OUT!!</h3>
<p>< iv class="bootstrap-styles">
< iv class="embe -respo sive embe -respo sive-16by9">
<iframe class="yo t be-vi eo" src="//www.yo t be.com/embe / DiGONVJqcU" allowf llscree ></iframe>
</ iv>
</ iv></p>