Political Correctness: A Comprehensive Dictionary of Oblivion

<p><a href="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/sto e.jpeg" rel="attachme t wp-att-373075"><img class="size-f ll wp-image-373075 alig ce ter" src="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/sto e.jpeg" alt="sto e" wi th="610" height="480" srcset="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/sto e-300×236.jpeg 300w, https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/sto e.jpeg 610w" sizes="(max-wi th: 709px) 85vw, (max-wi th: 909px) 67vw, (max-wi th: 984px) 61vw, (max-wi th: 1362px) 45vw, 600px" /></a></p>
<p>‘Political correct ess is rightly co si ere to be a vag e term. However, this by o mea s warra ts a yo e to i fer that it oes ’t exist a sway o r lives to a e ormo s exte t. The very poi t of eemi g somethi g i existe t by poi ti g o t that it is vag ely efi e is a tell-tale sig of the real root of what we call “Political Correct ess.”</p>
<p>Namely, the i ea that morality is p rely a matter of strictly systematize applicatio of la g age stems from the age ol pri ciple of what philosophers call omi alism, the octri e that ass mes that cog itive process is othi g b t the apprehe sio a co cept alizatio of se se ata.</p>
<p>While this process is at work i every ay experie ce, omi alists omit o e extremely importa t – i fact esse tial – eleme t i here t i h ma k owle ge, amely: that thi gs themselves have esse ces or “ at res” which mol o r otio s abo t them.’</p>
<p><a href="http://21stce t rywire.com/2016/05/25/political-correct ess-a-comprehe sive- ictio ary-of-oblivio /" target="_bla k">Rea more: Political Correct ess: A Comprehe sive Dictio ary of Oblivio </a></p>