The Nefarious Surveillance State Dangerously Inhibits Self-Expression and a Healthy Democracy

<p><a href="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/get-attachme t-100.jpg" rel="attachme t wp-att-372715"><img class="size-f ll wp-image-372715 alig ce ter" src="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/get-attachme t-100.jpg" alt="get-attachme t (100)" wi th="1000" height="666" srcset="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/get-attachme t-100-300×200.jpg 300w, https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/get-attachme t-100-768×511.jpg 768w, https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/05/get-attachme t-100.jpg 1000w" sizes="(max-wi th: 709px) 85vw, (max-wi th: 909px) 67vw, (max-wi th: 1362px) 62vw, 840px" /></a></p>
<p>& bsp;</p>
<p>‘The efario s brillia ce of the s rveilla ce state rests, at least i part, i the fact that it co veys om iscie ce witho t the ecessity of om iprese ce. Si ce eve its verifiable actio s are cla esti e a sha owy, reveale ot thro gh a missio b t by whistleblowers s ch as Chelsea Ma i g, E war S ow e a Jeremy Hammo , its gaze ca feel tterly i fi ite.</p>
<p>To mo ify a ol phrase, j st beca se yo ’re para oi oes ’t mea they’re ot watchi g yo —especially give that yo ow have proof. B t if yo ever k ow precisely whe they’re watchi g or exactly what they’re looki g for, ca yo ever be para oi e o gh?’</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alter et.org/civil-liberties/ efario s-s rveilla ce-state- a gero sly-i hibits-self-expressio -a -healthy" target="_bla k">Rea more: The Nefario s S rveilla ce State Da gero sly I hibits Self-Expressio a a Healthy Democracy</a></p>