Climate Supercomputers – Garbage In, Garbage Out

‘I’m often asked if I believe in so called climate change theory that we used to call “global warming.” Happens even more often now, since President Trump decided to get us out of the Paris climate accords, the best thing he’s done since becoming POTUS. My usual answer is an emphatic, “No, I don’t believe and here’s why Iíve become a climate realist.”
The science behind this divisive subject is far from settled, though the MSM obviously disagrees and wants you to believe that it is. At this point, it’s really no more than a theory grown into a belief system, with a lot of converts, likely to be seen by future historians as the biggest boondoggle in the history of science. It’s not uncommon for scientists and people in general to blindly believe in whatever the scientific herd is saying about any given issue. Grants are at stake. The main reason so many scientists believe is in the results spewing out of supercomputers. They must like what they’ve been seeing.
Supercomputers are never wrong, right? Seems that questioning climate science has become a taboo, with overtones of religious fervor, becoming a just a bit scary. Considering the current, early stage of software development, imprecise coefficients, variables and errors, I figure it has about a 20% chance of roughly predicting the course of our future climate 10 years out. Something to believe in?’
Read more: Climate Supercomputers – Garbage In, Garbage Out