Author: Alicia

The truly disastrous, still worsening results of the last 15 years’ Bush and Obama wars and economic crises—including perhaps 50 million refugees now fleeing war and immiseration—have now finally been met by a decisive change. To the expressed great anger of Obama operatives in the White House, State Department and the media, the primary movers of the change are Vladimir Putin’s Russia and Xi Jinping’s China, acting together, especially since their recent celebrations of the defeat of fascism in World War II 70 years ago.

Flanking the Obama drive for confrontation and even nuclear war, first in Europe and now around Syria, Putin has moved, with China, to set up a dynamic process internationally. The new dynamic includes both the possibility of ending the genocidal wars ruining the Mideast, North Africa and in the center of Europe; and the offer of a new system of economic cooperation striving for productivity and development, not geopolitical power. That dynamic is the only, though difficult, prospect for solving the crisis of millions of refugees fleeing and dying in the entire Mediterranean region.

This has been responded to by Germany, and by France, and in that context Germany changed its policy to align itself with cooperation what that process.

They recognized that the whole system they’ve been operating on, was potentially relieved by what Putin did, and what China did. It is not national; this process is a matter of change in the condition of the planet.

This new dynamic was discussed in a Sept. 12 public dialogue in Manhattan, directed toward the approaching United Nations General Assembly session, by EIR’s Founding Editor Lyndon LaRouche, former U.S. Senator Mike Gravel, former Attorney General Ramsey Clark, and Schiller Institute founder Helga Zepp-LaRouche. Senator Gravel immediately moved to give a packed press conference at the United Nations Sept. 14, featuring EIRSpecial Report on the BRICS dynamic, The New Silk Road Becomes the World Land-Bridge. He specified to the international press: China’s offer of economic development in particular, is the solution to the wreck of U.S. foreign and economic policy under Obama.

September 12, 2015 International Schiller event featuring Lyndon & Helga LaRouche, Ramsey Clark and Mike Gravel.

The new dynamic means that Obama is in deep trouble, flanked by Putin as his Administration is belatedly realizing. As Lyndon LaRouche stated in Monday’s LPAC Policy Committee show,

“Obama is probably doomed, to be thrown out of office, one way or the other. Wall Street will be shut down. It will not be paid off. It will shut down, absolutely! Because there’s no future for Wall Street. The whole money system as it’s so far defined, as you see in the case of the British case. The British system economically is a farce; Wall Street is a farce, absolute farce.

“So we’re going to have to operate on the discovery, of agreements converging on different parties, converging on the idea of a new view of the planet as a whole. And the discussion of that process, the process as a process; don’t pay any attention to the facts, because the facts are going to change so rapidly, that they won’t count for much. We’ve already seen and experienced that ourselves. We’ve experienced it in the world as a whole. There is no fact which is fixed in this process. It’s a process.”

And we are going to have to operate on the discovery of agreement among different parties, converging on the idea of a new view of the planet as a whole.

Join us every Thursday evening at 9 PM eastern for a live Q&A session with American Statesman Lyndon LaRouche. Have a question? Call into our National Center ahead of time at 800-929-7566, or include your question for Mr. LaRouche in the comments section of our Youtube event.

The world’s eyes are focused in NYC as a series of high level meetings take place at the United Nations. Join us every Monday at 1pm Eastern with Lyndon LaRouche and get the political update you need to start your week.

The war on ISIS is being sabotaged by “other aims” in the mind of Obama’s forces, said Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in an interview with Channel One TV, as reported by TASS Sunday.

Lavrov added that when there was a question of destroying chemical weapons a year ago, Assad was considered a legitimate president of Syria and his actions were welcomed in UN Security Council resolutions.

Over 100 activists attended a day-long symposium in New York City on Saturday, Sept. 12, commemorating the 14th anniversary of the original Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.  The conference spotlighted the fight for the declassification of the 28 pages from the original Joint Congressional Inquiry.  EIR Senior Editor Jeffrey Steinberg addressed the conference as part of a panel on “The Secret 28 Pages—Push to Declassify.” Steinberg was joined on the panel by Wayne Madsen and conference organizer Les Jamieson.  The panel began with a 10-minute excerpt from a CNN news broadcast on the fight to declassify the 28 pages, and a brief segment of one of the recent Capitol Hill press conferences.

Steinberg told the audience that the LaRouche movement’s probe of 9/11 actually began nine months before the attack—when LaRouche national spokeswoman Debra Freeman delivered testimony opposing the confirmation of John Ashcroft as the Bush-Cheney Attorney General, on the grounds that the administration was committed to a bureaucratic fascist takeover, to be triggered by a Reichstag fire incident.  So LaRouche was fully prepared when the 9/11 attacks occurred.  Steinberg reviewed the fight to declassify the 28 pages and the special role that the LaRouche movement played in forcing the issue to the fore.

Steinberg’s remarks were seconded by Madsen, who carried the consequences of the coverup of the Saudi role in 9/11 up to the present, with the subsequent emergence of the Nusra Front, the Islamic State, and other Al Qaeda spinoffs.

The conference was energized by the laser focus on the 28 pages fight, which was taken up again at the closing question and answer session, which was again forcefully addressed by Steinberg.

John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man also spoke at the conference and threw his weight behind the fight to declassify the 28 pages.

Former Senator Bob Graham, former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and co-chair of the Joint Congressional Inquiry into the 9/11 terrorist attacks, spoke Thursday night at a UCLA forum organized there at the Hammer Forum, where he delivered a thorough and systematic review of the public record on Saudi involvement in the 9/11 attacks and called for the 28 pages of the 9/11 report to be declassified and released to the public. On the panel with him was former CIA agent and author Robert Baer, an expert on Islamic terrorism.

“One of the most under-discussed and most important issues” facing our nation is the report on 9/11 and the networks behind it, Graham said in opening.  He began by quoting the first witness to the Joint Congressional Inquiry—a woman who lost her husband in the attack on the World Trade Center.  “All we have are tears and the resolve to find the answers,” she told the committee, saying, “we have an obligation” to those children to provide the answer as to “why their mother or father never returned” on 9/11.

Sen. Graham’s speech and his answers to questions were, according to EIR editorial board member Jeff Steinberg, “a thoroughly composed documentary account” of the Saudi involvement.  In the question period, all of the questions were riveted on the Saudi role, and Graham focused on the legislation calling for the release of the 28 pages and the crucial fight for the release before us now.

In his presentation, Baer said that what really disturbs him is that the 28 pages have not been made public. “Just like the Kennedy assassination,” he said, “you have to get this stuff out.”  He said that based on the nature of the intelligence in that report, “it would be very easy for the FBI and CIA” to pursue these networks.  “But this administration as the last administration does not want to deal with the truth.”

The full program can be watched here.

This event is accompanied by a large number of articles and TV spots that highlight the fight for releasing the 28 classified pages, especially in Boston, where two planes were hijacked and where Rep. Stephen Lynch is co-sponsor with North Carolina Republican Walter Jones of the bill to release the pages.

THE SUN-HERALD IN FLORIDA has an article by investigative reporter Dan Christensen, whose publication, Floridabulldog.com has an FOIA suit against the Justice Department.  The article quotes Sen. Graham, lawyers for the 9/11 families, and court documents, and recounts that “the FBI’s Tampa field office alone holds 80,000 classified pages in its 9/11 file,” including “details of a once-secret FBI investigation of a Saudi family with apparent ties to the 9/11 hijackers” who fled Florida suddenly.

THE BOSTON HERALD interviewed Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) on his bipartisan legislation to declassify the 28 pages, writing, “’We still don’t have the complete story on the weeks and months of preparation by the hijackers,’ Lynch told the Herald. ‘We owe it to the families … transparency and truth is the best way to deal with this.’”  The article also quotes James Kreindler, a lead attorney in the 9/11 families’ lawsuit since 2002, where he says, “The Saudis provided the key financial support through charities, and then Saudi officials met a couple of the hijackers and got them their apartments, some English classes, flight school, and made sure they could sit tight and not get caught before 9/11.”

A new Fox News investigative news program, Full Measure with Sharyll Attkisson, aired what Fox describes as “a detailed look at the still-simmering controversy over the classification of 28 pages from a 2002 9/11 report that are said to indicate that the hijackers received financial and logistical support from Saudi Arabia.” The report includes interviews with Rep. Lynch, former Congressman Pete Hoekstra, and Terry Strada, the 9/11 widow and activist who spoke at a Schiller Institute event in Manhattan.

The website 28pages.org has posted several other major articles and statements, including a recent call by former FBI agent Mark Rossini, and a statement by national security whistle blowers Thomas Drake (NSA) and Coleen Rowley (FBI) to release the 28 pages. 

Manhattan will be a center of gravity for the entirety of world history, during an extraordinary month which will begin with a major meeting featuring Lyndon LaRouche and prominent guests in a dialog with a Manhattan audience this Saturday, Sept 12, followed by United Nations proceedings culminating in the 70th General Assembly General Debate from Sept 28-Oct 6. On the first day of that debate, Vladimir Putin is expected to make a proposal for an effective coalition against ISIS and terrorism. Obama would address the General Assembly on the same day, Sept 28, IF he is still President then, but we have it in our hands to insure that he will no longer be President, having been removed from office by Constitutional means.

The overarching reality which has made all this possible, is the total, irretrievable bankruptcy of the Wall Street-City of London financial system in the world’s greatest-ever financial crisis, the terminal systemic breakdown-crisis of which Lyndon LaRouche has been the only economist to have warned with precision, with ever-increasing refinement since the 1960s. When Wall Street comes down, Obama comes down.

By acting boldly, implicitly with China, to form a real anti-terrorism coalition,— including Syria’s legitimately elected President,— to actually defeat ISIS, Putin has called Obama’s bluff. Will Obama force the US government to openly protect and back head-chopping terrorists against Russia? Will he pursue his love-affair with Wahhabite terrorism to the point of threatening nuclear war with Russia for the sake of ISIS? He has already moved openly in that direction during the past two weeks, since Putin’s plans become known. If he continues to do so,— as he must, given his nature as a puppet of mad Queen Elizabeth,— he can be easily and readily removed, and he must be removed, by sane elements of the US government acting under the 25th Amendment, spurred into action by the Manhattan-centered forces led by Lyndon LaRouche.

If not, the alternative would be a thermonuclear war launched by Obama against Russia and China.

A major change has suddenly taken place in world history, and we must make ourselves the transmission-belt of that change. Russia and China have decided that Obama must go. We must usher him out now.

Now we have the opportunity to replace the exploded financial bubble with a Glass-Steagall system. We will sweep the shards of all the successive Bush-Obama bailouts out of the way, and create a national credit-system for the United States. We will create a Franklin Roosevelt-style recovery, albeit under circumstances far more difficult than Roosevelt faced. Federal credit will be emitted for productive employment, through a commercial banking system purged of Wall Street’s speculative gambling. Wall Street’s skyscrapers will be converted over to productive uses, as LaRouche has said.

This article first appeared in the September 11, 2015 edition of Executive Intelligence Review magazine.

by William F. Wertz, Jr.

More than six months ago, on Feb. 23, 2015, the “UN Security Council Panel of Experts on Libya” issued a detailed report on the chaos that has been spreading from that country since the 2011 overthrow and execution of Muammar Qaddafi. More and more of northern Africa and the eastern Mediterranean are being made into Twenty-First Century replicas of Dark Age hellholes. Refugees by the thousands are trying to flee to Europe. The world knows all this, but who is doing anything but ignoring it and the responsibility for these crimes against humanity?

Weapons Trafficking

Obama launched the war to overthrow Qaddafi in Libya, throwing his support to the al-Qaeda affiliated Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG). Weapons were provided to the LIFG by Obama through Qatar and the UAE. Once Qaddafi had been assassinated, this same al-Qaeda-affiliated LIFG network then ran weapons seized from Libyan stockpiles to al-Qaeda and ISIS terrorist organizations in Syria and throughout Africa. (See “Updated Fact Sheet: Obama’s Saudi Connection; the Obama—al-Qaeda Alliance” The UN Report findings are damning.)

Numbers indicate sections of the report on Libya by the UN Panel of Experts.

200. The Panel visited Chad, Egypt, Niger, Tunisia, and the Syrian Arab Republic, countries that have been affected by the proliferation of weapons since the beginning of the Libyan uprising.

201. Information gathered indicates that arms originating from Libya have significantly reinforced the military capacity of terrorist groups operating in different parts of the region, including in Algeria, Egypt, Mali, and Tunisia in particular.

202. The Tunisian authorities told the Panel that most military matériel used in terrorist activities came from Libya.

203. Egypt continues to be among the primary destinations for Libyan weapons. Transfers to Gaza through Egypt are also continuing. While the Syrian Arab Republic was a significant destination for Libyan arms during the first two years of the conflict, that trend appears to have faded in the past 12 to 24 months.

204. Several arms-trafficking networks have established themselves in the south of Libya since the revolution, continuing to draw on stockpiles diverted during and after the revolution. This guarantees sustained proliferation outside the country, particularly towards southern Algeria, Niger, Chad, and Sudan.

205. With the absence of State control over the south of Libya since the revolution, and the development of regional terrorist groups, concerns have been growing about the southern region becoming a strategic zone for terrorist groups in the Sahel, especially in terms of training, funding, rest and recuperation, recruitment and acquisition of military matériel. Matériel coming from Libya and destined for terrorist groups in Mali was seized or destroyed on several occasions in 2014 in Niger by the French-led Operation Barkhane.

Human Trafficking

The same UN Security Report also reports on the involvement of the terrorist groups in Libya in running the lucrative migrant business.

195. The Panel interviewed several professionals working on the issue of illegal migration to Europe via the Mediterranean Sea. They stated that the transnational networks organizing the human trafficking had agents embedded within the Libyan armed groups controlling territory along the smuggling routes. The armed groups provide access and help secure those operations in exchange for a fee. Most of the illegal immigrants are picked up from unseaworthy vessels by the Italian navy and coast guard. The role of Libya in the illegal immigration is pivotal. Italian officials explained to the Panel that, of 167,184 immigrants rescued at sea in 2014, 141,484, or 85%, had left from the Libyan coast.

196. The human trafficking business generates considerable income. The migrants, mainly from West Africa and the Horn of Africa, have to pay traffickers for the stages of their voyage. Migrants debriefed in Italy explained that the prices for the last leg alone, the boat crossing, ranged between $800 and $2,000, depending on sea conditions, vessel type, port of departure, and travel class. This means that, for an average price of $1,200 per migrant, the last part of the smuggling chain generated a total turnover of almost $170 million in 2014. Most illegal migrants leave from the western coastline of Libya. The Panel has not been able to confirm the names of militias and militia leaders involved, but continues to investigate the matter.

197. Armed groups control several important border crossings and entry points, allowing them to take percentages on ongoing trade and smuggling operations, including of drugs, arms, commodities and fuel.

Torture

Recently, it has been revealed that Muammar Qaddafi’s third son, Saadi Qaddafi, who is held in Hadba prison, which is under the control of LIFG’s Khalid alSharif, has been subjected to torture. A video was released by Arabic Clear News which shows Saadi Qaddafi being whipped on the soles of his feet by three unidentified individuals. Qaddafi’s lawyer has called the treatment “an international crime, crime of torture and cruel and inhumane treatment.”

The same UN Security Council Report indicates that it is fully aware of such torture perpetrated by Khalid al-Sharif’s National Guard which runs the prison.

79. First, the Panel has received consistent reports of serious human rights abuses at Hadba prison in Tripoli. The prison is controlled by militiamen supervised by Khaled al-Sharif and are commonly referred to as the National Guard, which was the armed group commanded by al-Sharif during the revolution.

Some of the Key War Criminal Underlings

Although the UN report states that it has been unable to confirm the names of the militias and militia leaders involved, the same report does indeed identify the role of key leaders of the LIFG, who were backed by Obama to overthrow Qaddafi, and then used in the effort to overthrow President Assad of Syria.

One of the key persons identified in the report is Khalid al-Sharif. Khalid al-Sharif was appointed on Jan. 11, 2013, to be the deputy minister of defense of Libya. He was previously the deputy emir of the al-Qaeda-linked LIFG, and as such, he was the LIFG military commander.

After the takeover of Tripoli, he worked with the Tripoli Military Council headed by Abdel Hakim Belhadj, who is the emir of the LIFG. Khalid al-Sharif then went on to form the National Guard, which works directly with the Border Guard and the Judicial Police in supervising many prisons. Although Khalid al-Sharif has since been sacked as the deputy minister of defense, he continues to run the National Guard, which has over 10,000 fighters at its disposal.

In sections 134, 135, and 143 of their Report, the Panel of Experts states that in his position as deputy minister of defense of Libya, Khalid al-Sharif bypassed the official Military Procurement Department of the Libyan Defense Ministry to sign authorizations for and to distribute weapons to terrorist groups.

142. In November 2014, the Panel inspected the cargo of the vessel Nour M, seized in Greece in November 2013, and including 55 containers and more than 32 million rounds of ammunition (1,103 tons) for assault rifles and machine guns, on their way to Tripoli. The Greek authorities provided the Committee and the Panel with full information and documentation. The latter indicated that the shipper was Ukrinmash, a Ukrainian State company, the consignee was the Ministry of Defence of Libya, and that the deal was brokered by TSS Silah Ve Savunma Sanayi Dis Ticaret Limited Sirkett, a Turkish company. The vessel belonged to TSS Group Tutun Sigara Sanayi Ve, another Turkish company. To date, Greece has not commenced any prosecution relating to this case of violation.

143. The note from the Libyan authorities confirming to the Ukrainian authorities that the Libyan authorities were ready to accept the cargo was signed by Khaled al-Sharif.

Wissam bin Hamid

On the night of Sept. 11, 2012, Wissam bin Hamid was the go-to man for Obama when the U.S. mission and CIA annex came under attack. Wissam bin Hamid is head of Libya Shield I. It was he who met the U.S. soldiers at the Benghazi Airport that fateful night. First he delayed the U.S. relief forces for approximately three hours from departing the airport to go to the CIA annex. Then his forces accompanied the U.S. forces to the CIA annex, which shortly thereafter came under mortar attack. After the attack, he helped to escort the bodies of the four Americans killed that night in Benghazi to the airport.

When the FBI finally went to Benghazi to investigate the attacks, it was Wissam bin Hamid who was relied upon to escort them and provide them with protection.

In August 2012, just before the Sept. 11 Benghazi attack, the U.S. Library of Congress issued a report entitled Al-Qaeda in Libya: A Profile. In that report it was stated that Wissam bin Hamid was the head of al-Qaeda in Libya. The report also reported that Mokhtar bel Mokhtar, the head of al-Qaeda in the Maghreb, had been his special invited guest at a demonstration in March 2012 in the city of Sirte.

When Wissam bin Hamid met with a U.S. advance team in Benghazi days before the arrival of Ambassador Chris Stevens, he reported to a U.S. official that if his favored Muslim Brotherhood candidate for Libya Prime Minister did not win an upcoming election, the Libya Shield would not continue to guarantee security in Benghazi.

Where is Wissam bin Hamid today? According to the Panel’s report, Wissam bin Hamid is working with Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi on behalf of the Islamic State.

44. Benghazi Revolutionaries Shura Council figureheads Mohammed al-Zahawi (Ansar al-Sharia), Wissam bin Hamid (Libya Shield I), and Jalal Makhzoum (Rafallah al-Sahati brigade) have been featured together in several pictures and videos that were made during or after military operations, showing that the alliance also exists at an operational level. Their recorded speeches and written statements confirm that the coalition has little interest in the stabilization of the Libyan state. The Benghazi Revolutionaries Shura Council has made repeated statements rejecting Libyan democracy and stressing the need to install the rule of God. As such, and this is confirmed by their actions, these groups appear more interested in establishing strict sharia rule than in politics in Tripoli.

Ansar al-Sharia leader Mohammed al-Zahawi was reported to have announced the establishment of an Islamic emirate on Radio Tawahid (Islamic Unification).

48. The commander of the eastern Libya Shield brigade, Wissam bin Hamid, had previously been accused by Coptic Christians of running a detention facility where they underwent torture. Sources, including a victim, confirmed to the Panel that bin Hamid was frequently involved in arbitrary arrests, sometimes to obtain ransoms and benefit financially.

49. Furthermore, the Panel has seen several pictures on social media, allegedly showing the Islamic Youth Shura Council organizing rallies in support of Islamic State.

The UN report merely confirms that Wissam bin Hamid today is precisely what the U.S. Library of Congress report said he was prior to Benghazi. And this is the man Obama relied upon to provide security for our forces in Benghazi! It is hardly credible that the U.S. Library of Congress would have better intelligence than the intelligence available to the President. One can only come to the conclusion, reached by Gen. Michael Flynn, that the policy pursued by Obama was a “willful decision.”

Abdul Hakim Belhadj

Belhadj was the emir of the al-Qaeda-affiliated Libyan Islamic Fighting Group before, with Obama’s support, he became the head of the Tripoli Military Council after Qaddafi was forced to flee the city. Approximately one week after being named commander of the Tripoli Military Council, in August 2011, Belhadj travelled to Qatar where he met with NATO officials. Did the NATO officials not know that Belhadj was al-Qaeda?

Where is Belhadj today? According to Global Research, “Belhadj has now firmly ensconced himself as the organizational commander of the ISIS presence inside Libya. The information comes from an unnamed U.S. intelligence official who has confirmed that Belhadj is supporting and coordinating the efforts of the ISIS training centers in eastern Libya around the city of Derna, an area long known as a hotbed of jihadi militancy.”

Washington sources confirm that President Obama has rejected Russian President Putin’s intervention against the Islamic State inside Syria and is, predictably, trying to subvert the Russian efforts. Late last week, Obama communicated through Secretary of State Kerry to Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov that the U.S. opposes any Russian military action in support of the Assad government in Damascus. Obama’s message was that Russian action is “not productive” and that Russia should, instead, join the U.S.-led “coalition.” In addition, the White House has ordered pressure on all U.S. allies to deny Russia any overflight privileges for planes headed to Syria, and has already brought pressure to bear on both Greece and Bulgaria.

Lyndon LaRouche on Tuesday noted that Obama is walking right into Putin’s trap in Syria. Russian President Putin has already decided to intervene to preserve the Syrian state and the Assad government. Russian military “advisors” are already in the country, and more advanced Russian military equipment is coming in to Syria, aimed at enabling the Syrians to launch a full-scale conventional war against the Islamic State. According to one U.S. source, Russian surveillance drones are already mapping out territory held by ISIS and Nusra Front and other Western-backed rebel groups. Increasingly, Obama will be faced with exposure for backing ISIS or capitulating to the Russian operations. Either way, Putin has made his decision and will not back down, LaRouche emphasized. Obama cannot handle such a firm action by Russia and is headed for a real freak-out. Putin has decided to wipe out ISIS and Obama can’t handle that.

LaRouche noted that the Putin action in Syria is consistent with the growing Russian-Chinese cooperation, as evidenced at the Sept. 3 V-Day parade in Beijing, where Putin was at Chinese President Xi Jinping’s side throughout. 

I’m interested, tell me more

The Syrian Foreign Ministry of President Bashar Assad delivered two letters post haste Sept. 6 to UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon and to the Chairman of the UN Security Council Vitaly Churkin, that attack in withering terms, the mootings by British Prime Minister David Cameron and other members of his government over the past 72 hours, that Britain may engage in a bombing campaign on Syrian territory, purportedly against ISIS.

The letters, as paraphrased by the government’s Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA), note that “The British government has no right to preach to others about democracy, human rights, and combating terrorism, when it itself has employed all its capabilities and brought into play its ‘colonialist experience’ in providing all forms of support, including financially, militarily, politically and media-wise, to the terrorist organizations in Syria.

“The fact that the British government has sent terrorists and extremists to Syria, such as its national ‘John, the ISIS Slaughterer,’ and harbored over tens of years others like Abu Qatada and Omar Abdel-Rahman, reveals Britain’s political hypocrisy and the falseness of its claims about promoting democracy, fighting terrorism and protecting human rights.”

The letters state that the activity by the British government, including its Foreign Office, with respect to Syria is that of “providing direct support to the terrorist organizations.” Britain “contradicts the countries’ duty of defending their territories and people under the UN Charter and in accordance with the international law and the Security Council resolutions.”

The Syrian Foreign Ministry letters conclude that “Britain should rather preach to itself, especially because it is a permanent member state of the UN Security Council, before preaching to others, since many people, including of the region’s countries and those of Asia, the Middle East and Latin America, are up till now suffering from the colonialist policies of Britain and other colonialist states.”

The Syrians have put their finger on the colonial and war-provoking policy of Her Majesty’s government, which has orchestrated wars in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, as well as Ukraine, which could trigger a global war of nuclear annihilation.