Unnamed U.S. officials said, Sunday, that President Obama has decided to allow U.S. airstrikes in support of U.S.-trained rebels no matter who brings them under fire, even if it comes from the Syrian army. White House National Security Council spokesman Alistair Baskey told Reuters that only the U.S.-trained forces were being provided a wide range of support, including “defensive fire (in layman’s terms, airstrikes) support to protect them” and pointed to the July 31 U.S. airstrikes as proof, in support of the rebel group Division 30 when it came under attack from Al Nusra.

Reuters notes the possibility that U.S. forces might come into direct confrontation with Syrian government forces cannot be ruled out. Indeed, some might argue that Obama’s policy makes such a clash inevitable, despite the stipulation that U.S. policy is aimed only at ISIS, and the administration’s failure to get Congress to support a direct attack on the Assad government in the late summer of 2013.

Historian Stephen R. Weissman, writing in an Aug. 2 op-ed in U.S. military newspaper Stars & Stripes, argues that in fact, the Obama Administration is following a pattern that was first set in the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 when President Lyndon Johnson deceived the American public about the presence of U.S. military forces in Southeast Asia. The result was war that devastated Vietnam, the U.S. military and U.S. foreign relations. That pattern, however, has continued ever since.

Weissman particularly points out the U.S./NATO attack on Libya in 2011, which was promoted as protection of civilians, but was really about regime change.

“Indications are that the problem of deceptive military missions persists today as the U.S. expands its military presence in the Middle East to confront violent jihadis,” writes Weissman.

What began as a program to train armed opponents of the Assad government has morphed into a program to target ISIS. U.S. officials were then hinting that they might extend U.S. involvement to include “protection” of the forces the U.S. is training as they integrate with existing rebel groups in Syria.

“Such scenarios could bring America into direct conflict with Syrian government forces,” Weissman writes.

Further potential expansion comes with the discussions of establishing a safe zone inside Syria along the Turkish border.

“What appears then to be a stealthy expansion of the anti-Islamic State ‘train-and-equip’ mission could have major consequences for U.S. policy in the Middle East, which the administration has not discussed publicly,” Weissman writes. “An increased U.S. military commitment to anti-Assad rebels on the ground could produce military responses by Syria’s allies — Iran, Hezbollah and Russia.”

Indeed, Moscow, Monday, warned that U.S. attacks on Syrian troops will only further destabilize the situation. Moscow has “repeatedly underlined that help to the Syrian opposition, moreover financial and technical assistance, leads to further destabilization of the situation in the country,” Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov said, adding that IS terrorists may take advantage of this situation.

And the Obama Administration, Weissman notes, is doing all of this without a plan for bringing the war to a satisfactory conclusion and without consulting with or authorization from the U.S. Congress.

“These are the very consequences that the public feared when it demanded that Congress pull the plug on the administration’s plan to bomb Syria in September 2013,” Weissman concludes. “During this Presidential election year, voters need to communicate to the candidates that they will hold them accountable for telling the truth about the purposes of American military missions and their potential consequences.”

 

SEE “Stop WWIII”

If you recognize that human beings are not animals, and can shape the future of their own species, you will act now to prevent its extinction by the nuclear war which is threatening us, in the actions of President Barack Obama.

The latest in Obama’s escalating war threat against Russia and China — his order to U.S. air forces bombing in Syria to “engage” Syrian government forces when deemed necessary — drew an immediate warning from Moscow, and draws us a step closer. The proposal from a NATO advocate in Ukraine for a U.S./Europe oil embargo “to crush Russia” is another step. The NATO “Trident Juncture” exercise next month, practicing nuclear war right on Russia’s border, will be another in the step-by-step buildup awaiting a trigger, like the buildup to World War I a century ago.

World wars are started in a step-by-step process of escalating threat, wars, and mobilizations, in which no one can forecast precisely which step will set off the trigger. But it can be seen, by Americans willing to face the future, that Obama — under British manipulation — is pushing those escalating steps of confrontation with Russia and China.

We are coming closer and closer to doomsday, the point one of Obama’s many wars and escalations triggers World War III. It is increasingly recognized internationally, that this situation is converging on civilization. The human race is in the greatest danger of extermination. Therefore we have to be the sparks in the mobilization to stop this, by forcing Obama out of office, and you can be among those sparks.

EIR Founding Editor Lyndon LaRouche has proposed, urgently, that Hillary Clinton can get Obama out, by telling the truth publicly about Benghazi, when he ordered her, and others, to lie about what his Libya War had wrought. That act would cost Hillary her chance to be President, but it will bring Obama down. And it would show that any human being can exercise the uniquely human power, abruptly to shift the history and future of the human race. Not to believe she could do this, is simply cynicism, or “animal calculation.”

We have to get some in positions of influence to do this. September will be too late. Things must be put in motion soon, to get Obama out of power. We are the sparks for this.

We need a large and directed clamor now, in the United States and Europe. But that means that their citizens must stop being self-absorbed, “practical,” and, as a result, stupid. Human beings, unlike animals, are able to recognize this kind of danger to the future of their kind, and to stop it.

We are on a full mobilization to do that.

Tell me more, I’m interested

Since the Wednesday, July 29 release of the LaRouchePAC statement: “To Stop World War III, Hillary Must Oppose Obama’s Benghazi Lies,” the issue of Hillary Clinton, Obama, and Benghazi has begun to gain significant traction in the media, and in the Presidential campaign.

The climate is stirring, and there are several articles which appeared at the end of the week that make the point that Obama is making Clinton the scapegoat for the Benghazi travesty.

As Lyndon LaRouche has advised and warned, and as the LPAC press release states, with Congress out in recess, Obama must be reined in to prevent World War III.

Friday it was bluntly reported in the Washington Times that, because of Obama betrayal of her on Benghazi, “Hillary Clinton is not going to be the Democratic nominee for president.”  The author, Monica Crowley, is the online opinion editor of the publication, and the article is titled, “Is Obama Taking Hillary out?”  Crowley recounts the “bad blood” between the Clintons and the Obamas going back to the 2008 primary race. When Obama made Clinton the Secretary of State, it was to abide by the maxim, “Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.”  Obama and Hillary do not trust each other, and Obama “wants the investigation [of Hillary for the email scandal], wants her nailed, wants her out.  And he’s doing it, slowly, steadily…. Hillary is being given the Judas kiss by her former boss, a man loyal to no one but himself.”  The article suggests that a Justice Department investigation, a long drawn-out special prosecutor investigation, or even an indictment could hit Clinton.

Hillary Clinton has no choice; she has to move pre-emptively against Obama using the truth about Benghazi, where Ambassador Chris Smith and three other Americans were murdered in a pre-meditated terrorist attack.

Key developments in the last 48 hours have exposed details of the crisis that Clinton faces and confirm more than ever that she must act now to stop Obama.

The Daily Caller reported on Thursday, July 30, that Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina, the former Hewlett-Packard CEO, told supporters in a Thursday call that the Benghazi “punch” could have brought down Obama in 2012, but it “didn’t get thrown.”

Fiorina spoke the truth, saying, “We thought in 2012 that Benghazi was Obama’s Achilles heel … But the punch didn’t get thrown. We can’t count on the media to do this … And so the only way to make sure these questions are asked and answered is to have a nominee who will demand an answer.”

Now, Fiorina stressed, that same Benghazi can bring down Hillary Clinton, and she said that she won’t shy away from a “damaging issue … like the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attacks, while debating Hillary Clinton,” the Caller reported.

[It should be noted that Fiorina also stated at a public town hall meeting that she supports the release of the redacted 28 pages of the Congressional report on the 9/11 attack in 2001.]

The situation got even hotter on Thursday, when the Obama administration marked some of Clinton’s emails from her private account as classified.  These are a new batch of emails from the 30,000 that Clinton turned over to the State Department months ago, and were released according to a deadline in an FOIA case.

“The Obama Administration slapped a secret designation Friday on a number of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s emails … raising more questions about whether her controversial email arrangement led to classified information being left unsecured,” reported the Washington Times July 31.  The Washington Times specified that the classification did not necessarily exist when Clinton exchanged the emails while she was Secretary of State, but that fact is not blunting the damage that the issue is doing to her.

The well-respected McClatchy news service provided further details about the latest batch of emails, noting that information from five separate intelligence agencies, the NSA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (responsible for mapping), the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the CIA are contained in the emails. The McClatchy article says, “Revelations put Clinton in crosshairs of broadening inquiry into whether she mishandled classified information,” and that “State Department officials warned there could be hundreds of classified emails.” 

Members of the Italian Parliament and professors of economics in Italy sent messages of support today to the U.S. Senators who have sponsored the Glass-Steagall bill.

The following mail message was sent by Antonio Maria Rinaldi (President, Riscossa Italiana, and Professor of Business Administration at Pescara University); Stefano Fassina (Member of the Italian Chamber of Deputies and former Deputy Finance Minister in the Renzi government); Antonino Galloni (Economist, Auditor at Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale); Claudio Celani (Vice President, Movimento Internazionale per i Diritti Civili—Solidarietà [movisol]):

“Dear Senators Warren, Cantwell, McCain, King, Sanders and Brown,

“We are following with great interest your initiative to reintroduce the Glass-Steagall Bill in the U.S. Senate. We are happy that this has become a major issue in the American political debate. Your action will inspire our fight in Italy, where several draft bills on Glass-Steagall have been introduced in both houses of Parliament.

“Separating commercial banks from investment banks is the key to relieve the world economy from the burden of unpayable speculative debt. The Greek crisis has shown that it is not a problem of Greece, but of Too-Big-to-Fail banks. The EU bailout money did not go to the Greek population, but was used to bail out international banks with the largest exposure in derivatives. At the same time, the Greek population has been reduced to poverty. Oppressing the population to save speculative banks is immoral and economically unsound.

“Without Glass-Steagall, there cannot be any solution. Greece cannot defeat the speculative bubble and this unjust economic system all alone.

“We therefore thank you for your courage in challenging Wall Street, and trust that your action will be successful.”

Another message was sent by Sen. Giuseppe Vacciano, independent, author of one of the several Glass-Steagall bills currently filed in the Italian Senate:

“The undersigned supports your very important battle to reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act in the United States, and understands well that the beneficial effects brought by this bill will be a vital gift also for Italy and the whole world.

“The undersigned, Giuseppe Vacciano, member of the Italian Senate, authorizes herewith the publication of his signature to the text above, in support of the American members of Senate who introduced a bill to reinstate Glass-Steagall.”

In addition to Friday’s letters to the U.S. Senate, other messages of support for Glass Steagall, from Italy and elsewhere in Europe, have come into the U.S. Congress in July.

On July 15, Sen. Stefano Candiani, Member of the Italian Senate, wrote to Sen. Maria Cantwell, “The Italian Senate is following with great interest the debate initiated in the United States by your bill….Greece cannot defeat the speculative bubble and this unjust economic system all alone. The European conference on debt held in London in 1953, which cut the German debt by half, took place while Glass-Steagall was still law. Only by reinstating it, will it be possible to cancel the speculative debt of Greece, mainly the derivatives exposure of Deutsche Bank, which cannot be repaid and should not be repaid.

“We therefore thank you for your courage in challenging Wall Street…”

On July 15, a support letter was sent to Rep. Marcie Kaptur, by two signators in Italy: Liliana Gorinia, Chairwoman of MoviSol, from Milan; and Alfonso Gianni, Director of Cercare Ancora Foundation in Rome, former Undersecretary to the Development Ministry. They said that, “Your bill inspired similar bills introduced to the Italian Parliament last year, but are yet to be discussed….The Greek referendum shows that 61% of the population wants to put an end to the austerity policy of the Troika, and go for a new credit system, which will only be possible with Glass-Steagall…” They ended their message, we “trust that your debate will bring hope also to Europe, which is otherwise betraying its own values and its culture in denying debt relief for Greece. Knock on wood!”

Video of ltTcpy5XD5o

Lyndon LaRouche returns to Manhattan! As the epicenter of culture, politics and economics of the nation, LPAC is hosting regular Town Hall events every Saturday in Manhattan featuring a live Q&A session with Mr. LaRouche.  This week: with the House of Windsor on its way out, which means the end of Wall Street and also the Obama Administration, the real key to victory is putting the last century of Mathematics behind us, and defining an institution of economy based on the science of human economy. Physical principles, not mathematical or financial principles, determine the present and future. A transcript of this discussion will be available soon.