Author: Alicia

The thugs of Wall Street—Citigroup, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Bank of America—have been spotted holding secret meetings in Washington to plot out a campaign against the Democrats in the Senate who criticize Wall Street, reported Reuters Friday. The article talks about bankers’ fears of Elizabeth Warren and Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown, because they talk about breaking up “too big to fail” banks; but their real target is clearly Democratic Presidential candidate Martin O’Malley and his drive for Glass-Steagall—which is never mentioned. Only a week ago, the same media that have picked up on the Reuters story were focused on O’Malley, whose speeches, interviews, and fiery op-ed pushing Glass-Steagall grabbed headlines.

According to Reuters, today some of these banks “have discussed withholding campaign donations to Senate Democrats in symbolic protest,” but bank officials claimed that the withholding of funds “was not discussed at a meeting of the four banks in Washington,” but rather only “one-on-one conversations between representatives of some of them.” Reuters also renders a sleight-of-hand, saying that the threatened amount of “non-contributions” is limited by federal law to only $15,000 per bank; but that doesn’t count the individuals from the firms contributing, which can add up to hundreds of thousands for election coffers.

Reuters‘ details about the Big Four’s Washington meeting last week are slim, but LaRouche PAC has reported extensively on JPMorgan’s personal interventions against Glass-Steagall. The thugs’ methodology is well-known, and is now out in the open.

The thugs of Wall Street—Citigroup, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Bank of America—have been spotted holding secret meetings in Washington to plot out a campaign against the Democrats in the Senate who criticize Wall Street, reported Reuters Friday. The article talks about bankers’ fears of Elizabeth Warren and Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown, because they talk about breaking up “too big to fail” banks; but their real target is clearly Democratic Presidential candidate Martin O’Malley and his drive for Glass-Steagall—which is never mentioned. Only a week ago, the same media that have picked up on the Reuters story were focused on O’Malley, whose speeches, interviews, and fiery op-ed pushing Glass-Steagall grabbed headlines.

According to Reuters, today some of these banks “have discussed withholding campaign donations to Senate Democrats in symbolic protest,” but bank officials claimed that the withholding of funds “was not discussed at a meeting of the four banks in Washington,” but rather only “one-on-one conversations between representatives of some of them.” Reuters also renders a sleight-of-hand, saying that the threatened amount of “non-contributions” is limited by federal law to only $15,000 per bank; but that doesn’t count the individuals from the firms contributing, which can add up to hundreds of thousands for election coffers.

Reuters‘ details about the Big Four’s Washington meeting last week are slim, but LaRouche PAC has reported extensively on JPMorgan’s personal interventions against Glass-Steagall. The thugs’ methodology is well-known, and is now out in the open.

The thugs of Wall Street—Citigroup, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Bank of America—have been spotted holding secret meetings in Washington to plot out a campaign against the Democrats in the Senate who criticize Wall Street, reported Reuters Friday. The article talks about bankers’ fears of Elizabeth Warren and Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown, because they talk about breaking up “too big to fail” banks; but their real target is clearly Democratic Presidential candidate Martin O’Malley and his drive for Glass-Steagall—which is never mentioned. Only a week ago, the same media that have picked up on the Reuters story were focused on O’Malley, whose speeches, interviews, and fiery op-ed pushing Glass-Steagall grabbed headlines.

According to Reuters, today some of these banks “have discussed withholding campaign donations to Senate Democrats in symbolic protest,” but bank officials claimed that the withholding of funds “was not discussed at a meeting of the four banks in Washington,” but rather only “one-on-one conversations between representatives of some of them.” Reuters also renders a sleight-of-hand, saying that the threatened amount of “non-contributions” is limited by federal law to only $15,000 per bank; but that doesn’t count the individuals from the firms contributing, which can add up to hundreds of thousands for election coffers.

Reuters‘ details about the Big Four’s Washington meeting last week are slim, but LaRouche PAC has reported extensively on JPMorgan’s personal interventions against Glass-Steagall. The thugs’ methodology is well-known, and is now out in the open.

To restore the mission of the US Presidency—without which the United States cannot survive—President Obama must be forced out of office, and all vestiges of the Bush family must be removed. After the experience of eight years of Bush-Cheney, following the earlier 12 years of George H.W. Bush, occupying the posts of Vice President and President, it is an abomination beyond belief that yet another Bush name has reappeared, as a potential Republican Party presidential candidate.

Until such time as Obama is removed from office, and the other legacies of the Bush name are removed, the US presidency will be crippled. Only after such a cleansing can the mission of the Presidency be restored. The Bush family disease did not start with George W. Bush or even with George H.W. Bush. It began with Prescott Bush and his Nazi collusion before and during World War II. That Nazi collusion persists to this day, within the Obama presidency, in the form of former Dick Cheney national security aide Victoria Nuland, who is the Obama Administration’s liaison to the Ukrainian neo-Nazis and oligarchs.

The Bush problem was persistent in the Reagan Administration, when Bush was chosen as Vice President. His influence became all-the-more dominant over time, following the attempted assassination of President Reagan, early in his first year in office.

It is this Bush disease, and the shadow of this disease that hangs all over the Obama White House, that is on the edge of causing a war against Russia and in the Persian Gulf.

The deeper truth that cannot be ignored is that the entire trans-Atlantic financial system is hopelessly bankrupt. The US and Western Europe are bankrupt, and the surrounding areas are mush, as the result of that reality.

The United States is facing an existential decision: Either a qualified US President is elected, after the early ouster of President Obama from office by constitutional means, or the only hope for US survival is to cut some kind of a deal with Russia and China, both to avoid war, and to enter into the Eurasian BRICS process.

All of Hillary Clinton’s problems stem from the fact that she made a bad choice, accepting Obama’s poison pill offer to join the administration as Secretary of State. Had she stayed in the US Senate, with the backing of 16 million Democratic voters, she would have retained her independence, deepened her experience, and avoided the trap that she was drawn into by associating with the Obama Administration.

Fortunately, we now have a pre-candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination—Martin O’Malley—who is doing the right thing, putting policy above personality, and setting the basis for the United States to enter the new global paradigm, being set in place by the BRICS, the AIIB and the growing array of nations entering into that new “win-win” arrangement. This is the rejection of geopolitics of war. This is the proper basis for creating a new US government and putting the United States back on the course of Benjamin Franklin and Alexander Hamilton.

To restore a genuine American presidency, the Obama-Bush League must be removed, before they start yet another insane war. The recent actions of Bibi Netanyahu have opened the gates for the Republican yahoos to start a new war in the Persian Gulf.

So, the time has come to get rid of Obama. He should be forced to resign tomorrow. The cheerful effect, of such an action, would both guarantee war prevention, and set the basis for restoring the historic mission of the US Presidency, as envisioned by Franklin and Hamilton, and enshrined in our Federal Constitution.

To restore the mission of the US Presidency—without which the United States cannot survive—President Obama must be forced out of office, and all vestiges of the Bush family must be removed. After the experience of eight years of Bush-Cheney, following the earlier 12 years of George H.W. Bush, occupying the posts of Vice President and President, it is an abomination beyond belief that yet another Bush name has reappeared, as a potential Republican Party presidential candidate.

Until such time as Obama is removed from office, and the other legacies of the Bush name are removed, the US presidency will be crippled. Only after such a cleansing can the mission of the Presidency be restored. The Bush family disease did not start with George W. Bush or even with George H.W. Bush. It began with Prescott Bush and his Nazi collusion before and during World War II. That Nazi collusion persists to this day, within the Obama presidency, in the form of former Dick Cheney national security aide Victoria Nuland, who is the Obama Administration’s liaison to the Ukrainian neo-Nazis and oligarchs.

Fact sheet: Who Is Behind the Drive To Dismember Russia?

The Bush problem was persistent in the Reagan Administration, when Bush was chosen as Vice President. His influence became all-the-more dominant over time, following the attempted assassination of President Reagan, early in his first year in office.

It is this Bush disease, and the shadow of this disease that hangs all over the Obama White House, that is on the edge of causing a war against Russia and in the Persian Gulf.

The deeper truth that cannot be ignored is that the entire trans-Atlantic financial system is hopelessly bankrupt. The US and Western Europe are bankrupt, and the surrounding areas are mush, as the result of that reality.

The United States is facing an existential decision: Either a qualified US President is elected, after the early ouster of President Obama from office by constitutional means, or the only hope for US survival is to cut some kind of a deal with Russia and China, both to avoid war, and to enter into the Eurasian BRICS process.

All of Hillary Clinton’s problems stem from the fact that she made a bad choice, accepting Obama’s poison pill offer to join the administration as Secretary of State. Had she stayed in the US Senate, with the backing of 16 million Democratic voters, she would have retained her independence, deepened her experience, and avoided the trap that she was drawn into by associating with the Obama Administration.

Fortunately, we now have a pre-candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination—Martin O’Malley—who is doing the right thing, putting policy above personality, and setting the basis for the United States to enter the new global paradigm, being set in place by the BRICS, the AIIB and the growing array of nations entering into that new “win-win” arrangement. This is the rejection of geopolitics of war. This is the proper basis for creating a new US government and putting the United States back on the course of Benjamin Franklin and Alexander Hamilton.

To restore a genuine American presidency, the Obama-Bush League must be removed, before they start yet another insane war. The recent actions of Bibi Netanyahu have opened the gates for the Republican yahoos to start a new war in the Persian Gulf.

So, the time has come to get rid of Obama. He should be forced to resign tomorrow. The cheerful effect, of such an action, would both guarantee war prevention, and set the basis for restoring the historic mission of the US Presidency, as envisioned by Franklin and Hamilton, and enshrined in our Federal Constitution.