Germany made a step towards accepting Assad as a discussion partner, broadcasting a 25-minute interview with him for Germany’s state-run ARD TV channel.  In the interview conducted by ARD March 1, Assad says the ceasefire process was much delayed because of “the other countries who supervise the terrorists to work for them, mainly the Americans.”  As for the Syrian government, it started the process of internal reconciliation years ago, and if opposition militants put down their weapons and agree to rejoin civil life and to cooperate, they will get an amnesty.  The mixed group of foreigners and Syrians in the groups who share the ideology of an “Islamic State,” don’t accept anything “that doesn’t look like them,” he said.

Assad also said that the fact that many Syrians abroad, including refugees, took part in the last Presidential elections of Syria, is not taken notice of in the Western countries, although it shows that the majority of citizens, even those outside of Syria, remain interested and active in the political life of their country.

Asked whether he would be willing to step down, Assad said if the majority of the population wanted a change, he would of course step down, but the decision had to be made by the Syrians themselves.  He denounced the entire regime change discussion, asking, for example, if he were to demand that the German Chancellor step down, what would be the reaction in Germany to that?

Political changes in Syria are possible with a newly elected parliament, Assad said, but the state’s integrity and its Constitution must be kept, as must be the tolerance of religion—but IS and its backers abroad want to destroy the Syrian state, dividing it up according to religion.  At present, there is a humanitarian catastrophe in Syria, Assad added, denouncing charges that the government was sealing cities off under military siege as propaganda, because if the Syrian Army is not in a position to prevent the terrorists from continuing to receive weapons in these cities, it is not in a position to prevent food from being delivered into these same cities either. After all, the government is still sending vaccines even into Raqqa, despite the fact that it is occupied by IS.

Assad said he would wish Europe to play a constructive role onsite in Syria, which was in any case less expensive and more efficient than being occupied with the refugee influx, and he would also like Germany to play a leading role, but for that, Europe and Germany had to get more independent from the USA. Concerning Syria’s allies in this war—Russia, Iran, Lebanon, they are also fighting in their own interest in Syria, because IS and Al Nusra pose a threat also to these countries.  That Western politicians and media justify Syrian oppositionists using weapons against their own government, cannot be accepted, Assad added, because no western government would accept their own political opposition’s taking up arms.  And the western embargo against Syria is hitting the entire  population, worsening the situation.

Video of Y3rE_P1bFnQ

Helga Zepp-LaRouche, founder and Chairwoman of the Schiller Institute, spoke Wednesday in New Delhi at the Raisina Dialogue, co-sponsored by the Indian Ministry of External Affairs and the Observer Research Foundation. The two-day conference is described by its organizers as being “designed to explore prospects and opportunities for Asian integration as well as Asia’s integration with the larger world.” The event hosted more than 100 speakers from over 100 countries.

Audio titled helga-zepp-larouche-raisin-dialogue

MODERATOR: Now we have Mrs. Helga Zepp-LaRouche to speak on the Chinese Belt and Road initiative…. You have the floor.

HELGA ZEPP-LAROUCHE: Well, thank you very much.  I want to thank the organizers of this very distinguished forum to give me the opportunity to speak. Because I think most people know that mankind is in one of its most severe crises, and maybe the most important crisis in all of our history. The strategic situation is described by many analysts as more dangerous than during the height of the Cold War, which was the Cuban Missile Crisis; the trans-Atlantic financial system is headed for a new crisis, worse than 2008; and the refugee crisis in Europe is really not only a tremendous humanitarian crisis, but it is about to explode the EU.

Now, the question is, are we as a human civilization capable of changing wrong policies which have led to this crisis, or are we doomed to repeat the mistakes which have led, due to geopolitics, to two world wars in the 20th Century?  But fortunately, we are also witnessing the emergence of a completely new paradigm.  Under the leadership of the BRICS countries, a completely new set of relations among states is developing, based on mutual interest, economic cooperation, and collaboration in future-oriented, high-technology areas, such as thermonuclear fusion, the research into space, and therefore a deeper understanding of the physical principles of our universe.

The Chinese New Silk Road program, One Belt, One Road, is offering the Chinese economic miracle to be repeated in every country which wants to cooperate in this win-win perspective. Already 65 states are participating in this new model of cooperation, and it is in the process of overcoming geopolitics, and with that, the source of war, potentially forever.

The new agreement between U.S. Secretary of State Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov concerning a ceasefire for Syria, is potentially a game-changer for the entire strategic situation, provided that especially Russia, China, and India immediately work with the countries of Southwest Asia to implement a comprehensive build-up program, not only for the war-torn countries of Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, but for the entire region from Afghanistan to the Mediterranean, from the Caucasus to the Persian Gulf.  And with the trip of President Xi Jinping to the region, to Iran, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, the extension of the Silk Road is now on the table.

The Schiller Institute published a 370-page study with the title, “The New Silk Road Becomes the World Land-Bridge,” which is already available in Chinese, in Arabic, and soon in Korean, which is a blueprint for a comprehensive build-up of the whole world economy.  It contains a very concrete plan for Southwest Asia. So this region, between Asia, Europe, and Africa, has a huge development potential, with great human and natural resources, and it is uniquely located.

The Five Seas strategy announced in 2004 by President Assad can still be a reference point for an infrastructure net between the Mediterranean Sea, the Indian Ocean, the Red Sea, the Caspian Sea, and the Black Sea, making this region potentially a prosperious hub, for the vast increases of trade between Asia, Europe, and Africa.

Two major development corridors, one east-west, and another one north-south, will not only include integrated fast train systems, highways, pipelines, water projects, industries, and agriculture.  With modern technologies, such as nuclear energy for the desalination of vast amounts of ocean water and the ionization of moisture in the atmosphere, we can green the desert and reconquer large areas of the desert for agriculture and human habitation.

The New Silk Road, which already extends from Chongqing and Yiwu to Tehran, where the first Silk Road train arrived three weeks ago, can be extended from there via Baghdad, Amman, Aqaba, and then continue through a tunnel to Sharm el-Sheikh in the Southern Sinai to Cairo. The route crosses the Euphrates River, where ancient travel routes can be transformed into modern corridors, from the Basra port in Iraq at the Perusian Gulf, northwest to Aleppo. Existing railroads along the Euphrates in Iraq and a railroad between Aleppo in Syria and Deir ez-Zor on the Euphrates, should be modernized, and a new line from there to Baghdad connecting the main arteries of the Silk Road should be built.

Again, this corridor should not just be rail, but should integrate transport, energy production, distribution, communications, and create the conditions governing the location for the development of industry and new cities.

A land route to India connecting the Iranian rail network up to Zahedan on the Iran-Pakistan border, is on schedule to be completed.  Other lines, for time reasons very briefly: from Deir ez-Zor to Tadmor-Palmyra to Damascus and Beirut. A north-south link from Syria to the industrial zones of the Suez Canal; a north-south railway from Damascus to Mecca and Medina; a tunnel under the Bab el Mandeb Strait from Djibouti to the Arab Peninsula, and links to Europe, the Black Sea, and Russia.

India has good relations with practically all the countries of the region and has been asked already by Russia and China, to play a mediating role in such a developing perspective.  As Prime Minister Modi said, 65% of the Indian population is under 35 years of age, and that is the greatest asset of the country. These youth must be not only given a vision, to help to increase the productivity of Indian agriculture through the use of power, water, fertilizer, high-variety seeds, and so forth, so that the number of working people as farmers can be halved and that land be used for a build-up of infrastructure. But the youth of India can also be inspired to take it as their own mission, to participate in the economic transformation of Southwest Asia and Africa, and in this way, be part of creating a future for all of mankind.

The realization of such a development perspective, is the only way how to end the refugee crisis and revive the economies of Europe and the United States, and to develop all of Asia.

As nearly the entire US population, its would-be political leadership, and the whorish media are engaged in an orgy of fantasy and perversion known as the US presidential election, the US is dying in front of our eyes. There is no culture left—only the “reality show TV” of “Super Tuesday,” with candidates who are either oblivious to, or complicit with, the unraveling of the trans-Atlantic financial system, and the rush to thermonuclear war coming from the White House and the current leaders of the US Department of Defense and their London allies.

And yet there are still those in America who believe that they have a mission in life—a mission coherent with America’s founding fathers, and also with the cultural and economic leadership now coming from Asia, and from China in particular. And they must act to restore sanity to the US, now.

With Obama having shut down NASA’s manned space program, China is planning to land on the far side of the Moon. Lyndon LaRouche remarked today that “If you can’t see the back side of the Moon, you’re not civilized!”

We are now into the fifth day of the new truce in Syria, organized by John Kerry and Sergei Lavrov, who created a US-Russia military alliance even while the White House and the Defense Department mobilize for war on Russia and China. The ceasefire is not only saving lives in the immediate instance, but constitutes the critical opportunity to take actions necessary to oust the ‘killers who will kill again’—beginning with Obama, and including his London controllers.

Obama’s adherent Hillary Clinton has again come under fire for her willing backing of the killer Bush/Obama/London war policy in Southwest Asia. Scott Ritter, the American who served as a U.N. weapons inspector from 1991-1998, this week wrote that Hillary is lying, when she claims to have made the best ‘informed’ decision she could, in Spring, 2003, when, as a Senator, she voted to approve the U.S. invasion of Iraq. Before that critical Senate vote, Ritter came to Washington, with a private, expert briefing to lawmakers, but Hillary’s office snubbed him. Ritter briefed other senators at length, including Sen. Diane Feinstein of the intelligence committee, but Hillary refused to hear any of it. She refused to be informed at all. Why? Her “political fortunes” come first, Ritter says.

The game is given away by the fact that leading neocons are now throwing their support to Hillary as the real “WarCandidate!”

What is critical for the mobilization to be rid of Obama and his stand-ins once and for all, is human identity—that is, not to have all the answers and information, but to seek and act on truth, and beauty. This was displayed Tuesday on ‘the sidewalks of New York,’ by a LaRouchePAC rally in front of the planetarium of the Museum of Natural History. The mega-banner stated, “Bertrand Russell Was Wrong, Einstein Was Right! Man’s Future Is in Space!”

We are better than this, tell me more

On Feb. 23, Argentina’s Energy Minister Juan Jose Aranguren, former CEO of the Argentine branch of Royal Dutch Shell, promised that the Macri government intended to build the new nuclear plants—Atucha III and IV—in collaboration with China and Russia, as per 2015 agreements signed between those nations’ heads of state and then-President President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.

But Monday, the state-run Telam news agency reported that 600 workers at the Atucha III construction site have received their pink slips and will lose their jobs on March 31. Although these are contract workers, they are supervisors, managers, and technical personnel whose contracts have always automatically been renewed every three months, for the past year. Facundo Ocampo, lawyer for the Union of Construction and Related Workers of the Argentine Republic (UECARA), told Infocielo that the government, and specifically Energy Minister Aranguren, had made the decision on the firings.

Moreover, Diario Popular reported Monday that 2,200 workers at the Atucha II reactor were not paid January salaries, and are also threatened with job loss. The construction union, UOCRA, is now in a “state of alert,” and its secretary-general reports that the labor situation throughout the nuclear sector is “very grave”; he anticipates problems at the Atucha I plant and at the Embalse plant in Cordoba.

President Mauricio Macri has made clear he prefers “green” energy to nuclear or even hydroelectric energy, and has filled his Environment Ministry with agents of Greenpeace and Prince Philip’s World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF, World Wildlife Fund) who spend their time attacking the high-technology agreements made with China and Russia. On Feb. 23, the daily Pagina 12 reported the announcement by Communications Minister Aguad that the Arsat-3 geostationary satellite, which was scheduled to be launched in 2019, is now “delayed, for budgetary reasons.” Macri’s government replaced the management of the Arsat company, which has built the country’s satellites, to make it more “business-oriented.” 

The government of Argentine neo-liberal Mauricio Macri has signed an Agreement in Principle by which it will pay $4.65 bn. in cash to four vulture funds which have litigated against it for years: Elliott Management, owned by rapacious multibillionaire Paul Singer; Aurelius Capital Management; Davidson Kempner; and Bracebridge Capital. The amount offered represents 75% of the judgments the vultures had won in U.S. courts ($5.9 bn.), including principal and interest as well as legal fees. Another $235 mn. will go for claims outside the jurisdiction of the Southern District of New York, Bloomberg Business reported today. But recall that the vultures bought this debt at about 30% of face value when the county was in default — i.e., they are making off with over 200% profit through the destruction of the Argentine economy.

So, the vultures which former President Cristina Fernandez had accurately labelled “economic terrorists,” and whose blackmail and financial warfare failed to break her, got their deal with Wall Street’s man Macri. The vultures came away with a 25% haircut, far more generous that the 65% one that bondholders who participated in the 2005 and 2010 debt restructuring accepted.

In a statement released Monday, Special Master Daniel Pollack cautioned that the deal is not yet completed, and that another six weeks of negotiations will be needed to settle some unresolved issues. But he lavished praise on both Paul Singer, who has waged vicious warfare against Argentina for 15 years, and on Macri, whose “course correction,” he said, “was nothing short of heroic.”

Heroic? If completed, the deal will allow Macri to issue debt and borrow on international markets—he’s already received $5 bn. from a consortium of Wall Street banks—greatly increasing foreign debt which the previous government had significantly reduced, while assaulting living standards and jobs on behalf of foreign banks and multinationals. Whether Macri can implement his plans is contingent on Argentina’s Congress overturning two laws (the Lock Law and Sovereign Payment law) which prohbit settlements of the kind he just signed; payment to the vultures must also be made by April 14, or the deal is off. Congressional approval isn’t guaranteed, as legislators from the Kirchnerite Victory Front (FpV), and its allies, are expected to put up a tough fight. 

Dr. Mahathir Mohamad Tuesday resigned from the UMNO party, which has ruled Malaysia since independence in the 1950s. Mahathir, who was Prime Minister from 1981 to 2003, and who famously stood up to the IMF and George Soros in the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98, has been demanding the resignation of current Prime Minister Najib Razak for the past years, for corruption, involving a state fund set up by Razak; the loss of perhaps billions of dollars from the fund; a $700 million deposit discovered in a private Najib bank account which may have come from the fund but which Najib claims came from the Saudi Royal Family (!); and Najib’s firing of his Deputy Prime Minister and his Attorney General, because they wanted to investigate the case.

Dr. Mahahtir said he is quiting UMNO, because it is “supporting corruption” under Prime Minister Najib Razak’s leadership. “I won’t call it UMNO anymore, this is Najib’s party,” he said to the press today. “I feel embarrassed that I am associated with a party that is seen as supporting corruption — it had caused me to feel ashamed.”

He said he would not set up a new party or join any other party.

With the final results of the Iranian elections announced Monday, Feb. 29, by the Interior Ministry, a coalition of moderates and reformists has won a majority in the Majlis. The reformist candidates won at least 85 seats, and moderate conservatives, who will align with President Hassan Rouhani, won an additional 73 seats, giving the two groups an absolute majority in the 290 seat Majlis. Altogether 59 seats will be decided in a runoff election to be held sometime in April.

The moderate coalition also won a clear majority in the elections for the 88 seats on the Assembly of Experts, which will select the successor to Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei when he dies. The Assembly serves an eight-year term, and it is widely expected that Khamenei will have to be replaced during that timeframe. The two leading hardliners on the current Assembly of Experts—Assembly Chairman Mohammed Yazdi and Mohammed-Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi—were both defeated, according to a late news report from BBC, meaning that the only hardliner re-elected to the Assembly is Ahmad Jannati, who is head of the Guardian Council, which purged many candidates from the ballots before the Feb. 26 elections.

Both former President and moderate bloc leader Ayatollah Ali Hashemi Rafsanjani and President Rouhani were re-elected to the Assembly of Experts. The reform faction won all of the 30 Majlis seats from Tehran and 15 of the 16 Tehran seats on the Assembly of Experts. The most hardline “Principalist” slate in the Majlis elections won only 68 seats, down from its 100 seats in the previous Majlis.

These electoral shifts will give President Rouhani a mandate to move ahead with the economic openings, and will put more pressure on Khamenei to accommodate to those shifts. Khamenei is historically more closely aligned with the hardliners, but he has survived in power by playing a balancing act, factoring in the public mood.

Former National Intelligence Council Middle East and Africa specialist Graham Fuller has called for the United States to launch a gigantic Marshall Plan for the South, to solve the burgeoning refugee crisis, that will see billions of desperate people flooding into the North unless genuine development is achieved.

“Fences, patrol boats, walls, checkpoints, buying off countries to serve as refugee halfway-houses, more draconian immigration laws, feel-good invective against the immigrants lurking just outside our gates—all this is fantasy, just rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic,” he wrote.  Instead, Fuller calls for a full 50% of the bloated Pentagon and intelligence community budget to be put into a Marshall Plan fund.  “The problem,” he concluded, “is self-evident and multi-faceted, and no, money won’t do it all. But a couple of hundred billion ‘wasted’ in Africa and Latin America on infrastructure projects, schools, clinics, roads might actually improve things a lot more than our non-stop wars.”

The recent publication of studies highlighting the role of mankind as a powerful geological force, referred to as the “Anthropocene,” serve as a good opportunity to clarify how this concept overlaps and differs from Vladimir Vernadsky’s concept of the noösphere (and a great way to honor him just before his upcoming birthday on March 12th!). Going from the most general definition we can find of each of these terms, they seem to be close to synonymous. But what is most important is to remember that the same term can be used by different people who have different intentions and hence different shades of meaning can be implied. This is most clear in recent use of the term “anthropocene.”

Continue reading here.