The original Comey memo concluded that it was “reasonably likely” that Clinton’s private server was accessed or hacked by hostile entities.

Breitbart | The original Comey memo concluded that it was “reasonably likely” that Clinton’s private server was accessed or hacked by hostile entities.

Nearly a year later, Democrats and never-Trumpers are still working on a “soft palace coup” with the assistance of the MSM.

Nearly a year later, Democrats and never-Trumpers are still working on a “soft palace coup” with the assistance of the MSM.

Zero Hedge | Nearly a year later, Democrats and never-Trumpers are still working on a “soft palace coup” with the assistance of the MSM.

Information Liberation | It’s about damn time.

When the day arrives, are you ready for what will happen next?

When the day arrives, are you ready for what will happen next?

Michael Snyder | When the day arrives, are you ready for what will happen next?

United Front Against Austerity|Tax Wall Street Party American System Network|Thursday, January 4, 2018 Attempts to Suppress Books Like Fire and Fury or Exercise Prior Restraint and Censorship Belong to Authoritarian Regimes, and Are Alien to …

From our “Clippings From The Editing Room Floor” dept.”, comes this face-palming story that begins: “The third trial of Cliven Bundy has ended in a mistrial. The prosecution failed to turn over documents that would have helped the defense.” Put more bluntly: The trial of Nevada rancher and leader of the Sagebrush Rebellion, Cliven Bundy, his two sons and a co-defendant ended yesterday in a mistrial. Why? Because the government had lied out of its ass to the judge and hidden evidence that would have significantly aided the defense. In other words, in a legal system that has reframed “adversarial” to mean … Continue reading

The post This Just In (NOT) appeared first on LewRockwell.

It’s been said that good ideas don’t require force – while bad ones rarely get traction without it. True enough. But how about a qualifier? Whose ideas? Yours? Mine? There is a kind of tacitly agreed upon – or at least, rarely questioned – notion that we all agree on what constitutes a “good” idea. It’s the keystone of coercive collectivism, without which that ideology loses moral legitimacy. But in fact, we don’t agree about what a “good” idea is. Millions of individuals tend to have millions of individually variable ideas about that. So the question becomes: Whose ideas will prevail? If there … Continue reading

The post Whose Ideas? appeared first on LewRockwell.

In my last article for LRC I wrote about literature from the perspective of a somewhat educated abecedarian. I take solace that my opinions are not totally ridiculous by comparing my view of Madame Bovary (first developed about 25 years ago when I read the book) with that of George Sand (that I only recently read). Quoting myself, “In Madame Bovary on the other hand, Emma’s passions make her almost an evil person.  In fact almost every character is nasty.  The basic theme being that below the facade of bourgeois respectability lurks great evil.  Thus in the end Emma kills … Continue reading

The post Is All Great Art Religious? appeared first on LewRockwell.