Countering Pro-GMO Deceptions In The British Press

<p><a href="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/06/U title -126.jpg" rel="attachme t wp-att-373907"><img class="size-f ll wp-image-373907 alig ce ter" src="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/06/U title -126.jpg" alt="U title (126)" wi th="700" height="393" srcset="https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/06/U title -126-300×168.jpg 300w, https://www. avi icke.com/wp-co te t/ ploa s/2016/06/U title -126.jpg 700w" sizes="(max-wi th: 709px) 85vw, (max-wi th: 909px) 67vw, (max-wi th: 984px) 61vw, (max-wi th: 1362px) 45vw, 600px" /></a></p>
<p>‘I his rece t piece for The Times ewspaper i the UK, Visco t Matt Ri ley arg es that a ew report from the America Natio al Aca emies of Scie ces (NAS) leaves o room for o bt that ge etically e gi eere crops are as safe or safer, a are certai ly better for the e viro me t, tha co ve tio ally bre crops.</p>
<p>Ri ley a heres to the belief that GM tech ology re ces i sectici e se a spec lates that f t re GM crops will be eve safer, better for the e viro me t a better for h ma health. He says that it is a isgrace that Gree peace still campaig s agai st Gol e Rice, a vitami -e ha ce variety that its backers claim co l save h re s of tho sa s of lives a year.</p>
<p>Accor i g to Ri ley, oppositio from rich wester ers a s to the cost of bri gi g s ch crops to the market, which he arg es restricts the sprea of GM tech ology.’</p>
<p><a href="http://ri f.com/alt- ews/e itorials/co teri g-pro-gmo- eceptio s-british-press/" target="_bla k">Rea more: Co teri g Pro-GMO Deceptio s I The British Press</a></p>